These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14737140)

  • 21. [Knowledge on feet of clay].
    Dahlqvist R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1405-6. PubMed ID: 18574980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Ethics in publishing medical papers].
    Strâmbu I
    Pneumologia; 2012; 61(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 22783595
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
    Bergström R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Connections between open access publishing and access to gray literature.
    Banks M
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2004 Apr; 92(2):164-6. PubMed ID: 15088074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modern Healthcare rules. Our editorial code of ethics guides our coverage of the industry.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(44):18. PubMed ID: 16300208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
    Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Learning to review.
    Freedman R
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):433-5. PubMed ID: 23538810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bad peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation.
    Falagas ME; Alexiou VG
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2008; 56(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 18661263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gene editing poses challenges for journals.
    Cressey D; Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):594. PubMed ID: 25925451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two Levels of Ethical Issues in Academic Publishing.
    Zernes S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Oct; 25(5):1603-1604. PubMed ID: 29564644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Is editorial freedom vanishing?
    Hoey J
    Md Med; 2007; 8(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 17472145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Competing interests.
    Sharpe VA; Gurian-Sherman D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Oct; 21(10):1131. PubMed ID: 14520389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ghostbusters should only bust ghosts.
    Adamson LM; Whitman M; Jacobs A; Bunting-Early TE
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Oct; 26(10):1067-8. PubMed ID: 18846064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nothing to see here.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 May; 26(5):476. PubMed ID: 18464755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Constants and scientific progress.
    Dzau V; Frank M; Reich M; Austin MJ; Aebersold R; Cowley A; Housman D; Mulligan R; Rosenberg R
    Physiol Genomics; 1999 Nov; 1(3):107. PubMed ID: 11015568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Keeping peer-reviewed publication relevant in the internet age.
    Randleman JB
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):447-8. PubMed ID: 22767161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Peer review should continue after publication.
    Liesegang TJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Mar; 149(3):359-60. PubMed ID: 20172061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Peer review and refereeing in science.
    Lore W
    East Afr Med J; 1995 May; 72(5):335-7. PubMed ID: 7555893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.