These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14738521)
1. Visual prosody and speech intelligibility: head movement improves auditory speech perception. Munhall KG; Jones JA; Callan DE; Kuratate T; Vatikiotis-Bateson E Psychol Sci; 2004 Feb; 15(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 14738521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study. McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optical phonetics and visual perception of lexical and phrasal stress in English. Scarborough R; Keating P; Mattys SL; Cho T; Alwan A Lang Speech; 2009; 52(Pt 2-3):135-75. PubMed ID: 19624028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The roles of fundamental frequency contours and sentence context in Mandarin Chinese speech intelligibility. Wang J; Shu H; Zhang L; Liu Z; Zhang Y J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 23862913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Gaze patterns and audiovisual speech enhancement. Yi A; Wong W; Eizenman M J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 56(2):471-80. PubMed ID: 23275394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hearing speech in noise: seeing a loud talker is better. Kim J; Sironic A; Davis C Perception; 2011; 40(7):853-62. PubMed ID: 22128557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences. Stilp CE J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Infants' listening in multitalker environments: effect of the number of background talkers. Newman RS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):822-36. PubMed ID: 19429961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sine-wave and noise-vocoded sine-wave speech in a tone language: Acoustic details matter. Rosen S; Hui SN J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3698-702. PubMed ID: 26723325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Asynchrony tolerance in the perceptual organization of speech. Remez RE; Ferro DF; Wissig SC; Landau CA Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Aug; 15(4):861-5. PubMed ID: 18792517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation? Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Audio-visual speech perception off the top of the head. Davis C; Kim J Cognition; 2006 Jul; 100(3):B21-31. PubMed ID: 16289070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Mullennix JW; Pisoni DB; Martin CS J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):365-78. PubMed ID: 2921419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech. Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]