These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14738627)

  • 21. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance.
    van Rijn MHC; Bech A; Bouyer J; van den Brand JAJG
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2017 Apr; 32(suppl_2):ii6-ii12. PubMed ID: 28064161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Calculation of tolerance limits and sample size determination for clinical trials with dichotomous outcomes.
    Zaslavsky BG
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(3):481-91. PubMed ID: 17479395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Test Statistics and Confidence Intervals to Establish Noninferiority between Treatments with Ordinal Categorical Data.
    Zhang F; Miyaoka E; Huang F; Tanaka Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):921-38. PubMed ID: 24919157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interpreting results of clinical trials: a conceptual framework.
    Singh AK; Kelley K; Agarwal R
    Clin J Am Soc Nephrol; 2008 Sep; 3(5):1246-52. PubMed ID: 18728215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. P-values in research reports.
    Ranstam J
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Jun; 76(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 16156452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. 5 ways statistics can fool you--tips for practicing clinicians.
    West CP; Dupras DM
    Vaccine; 2013 Mar; 31(12):1550-2. PubMed ID: 23246309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Informative simultaneous confidence intervals in hierarchical testing.
    Schmidt S; Brannath W
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(4):278-83. PubMed ID: 24970284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.
    Gardner MJ; Altman DG
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Mar; 292(6522):746-50. PubMed ID: 3082422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical hypothesis testing.
    Marino RJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1995 Jun; 76(6):587-8. PubMed ID: 7763162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A sample size planning approach that considers both statistical significance and clinical significance.
    Jia B; Lynn HS
    Trials; 2015 May; 16():213. PubMed ID: 25962998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical significance versus clinical relevance. Part II. The use and interpretation of confidence intervals.
    Luus HG; Müller FO; Meyer BH
    S Afr Med J; 1989 Dec; 76(11):626-9. PubMed ID: 2595492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Confidence intervals in procedural dermatology: an intuitive approach to interpreting data.
    Alam M; Barzilai DA; Wrone DA
    Dermatol Surg; 2005 Apr; 31(4):462-6. PubMed ID: 15871325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Liberation From the
    Moyé L; Cohen M
    Circ Res; 2018 Apr; 122(8):1046-1048. PubMed ID: 29650628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence].
    Taube A; Malmquist J
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jul; 98(28-29):3208-11. PubMed ID: 11496808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adaptive vs. group sequential self-designing trials.
    Mehrotra DV; Fan X
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):710-2; discussion 713. PubMed ID: 16972723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Knowledge of epidemiology and statistics for an ophthalmic practitioner.
    Thomas R; Muliyil J; Paul P
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2001 Oct; 99(10):561-4, 566. PubMed ID: 12018541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A note on P-values under group sequential testing and nonproportional hazards.
    Gillen DL; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):546-51. PubMed ID: 16011703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Effects on scale and confidence intervals as alternatives to p < 0.05].
    Wierdsma AI; van Os J
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2013; 55(7):471-80. PubMed ID: 23868761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The quest for "power": contradictory hypotheses and inflated sample sizes.
    Feinstein AR; Concato J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Jul; 51(7):537-45. PubMed ID: 9674660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Critical Evaluation of Data Requires Rigorous but Broadly Based Statistical Inference.
    Cox NJ; Below JE
    Circ Res; 2018 Apr; 122(8):1049-1051. PubMed ID: 29650629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.