133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14738654)
1. The quality of routine examinations of the newborn performed by midwives and SHOs; an evaluation using video recordings.
Bloomfield L; Rogers C; Townsend J; Wolke D; Quist-Therson E
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):176-80. PubMed ID: 14738654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Routine examination of the newborn: the EMREN study. Evaluation of an extension of the midwife role including a randomised controlled trial of appropriately trained midwives and paediatric senior house officers.
Townsend J; Wolke D; Hayes J; Davé S; Rogers C; Bloomfield L; Quist-Therson E; Tomlin M; Messer D
Health Technol Assess; 2004 Apr; 8(14):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-100. PubMed ID: 15038906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A qualitative study exploring junior paediatricians', midwives', GPs' and mothers' experiences and views of the examination of the newborn baby.
Bloomfield L; Townsend J; Rogers C
Midwifery; 2003 Mar; 19(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 12634035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A national survey in England of the routine examination of the newborn baby.
Hayes J; Dave S; Rogers C; Quist-Therson E; Townsend J
Midwifery; 2003 Dec; 19(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 14623507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
Devane D; Lalor J
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomised-controlled trial in England of a postnatal midwifery intervention on breast-feeding duration.
Wallace LM; Dunn OM; Alder EM; Inch S; Hills RK; Law SM
Midwifery; 2006 Sep; 22(3):262-73. PubMed ID: 16380197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Routine examination of the newborn and maternal satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial.
Wolke D; Dave S; Hayes J; Townsend J; Tomlin M
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2002 May; 86(3):F155-60. PubMed ID: 11978744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Summary of the Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline, "Examination of the neonate"].
Flikweert S; Pijnenborg L; Assendelft WJ;
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Nov; 146(45):2140-4. PubMed ID: 12474554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neonatal examination: are midwives clinically effective?
Williamson A; Mullet J; Bunting M; Eason J
RCM Midwives; 2005 Mar; 8(3):116-8. PubMed ID: 15790180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.
Blix E; Sviggum O; Koss KS; Øian P
BJOG; 2003 Jan; 110(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 12504927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Midwives' competence: is it affected by working in a rural location?
Hundley VA; Tucker JS; van Teijlingen E; Kiger A; Ireland JC; Harris F; Farmer J; Caldow JL; Bryers H
Rural Remote Health; 2007; 7(3):764. PubMed ID: 17691856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A qualitative study exploring midwives' perceptions and views of extending their role to the examination of the newborn baby.
Rogers C; Bloomfield L; Townsend J
Midwifery; 2003 Mar; 19(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 12634037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Change in knowledge of midwives and obstetricians following obstetric emergency training: a randomised controlled trial of local hospital, simulation centre and teamwork training.
Crofts JF; Ellis D; Draycott TJ; Winter C; Hunt LP; Akande VA
BJOG; 2007 Dec; 114(12):1534-41. PubMed ID: 17903231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational programme promoting the introduction of routine antenatal enquiry for domestic violence.
Salmon D; Murphy S; Baird K; Price S
Midwifery; 2006 Mar; 22(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 16246470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomised controlled trial of maternal satisfaction with the routine examination of the newborn baby at three months post birth.
Wolke D; Davé S; Hayes J; Townsend J; Tomlin M
Midwifery; 2002 Jun; 18(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 12139912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing cardiac physical examination skills using simulation technology and real patients: a comparison study.
Hatala R; Issenberg SB; Kassen B; Cole G; Bacchus CM; Scalese RJ
Med Educ; 2008 Jun; 42(6):628-36. PubMed ID: 18221269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inter-observer variation in paediatric clinical signs between different grades of staff examining children admitted to hospital in Tanzania.
Nadjm B; Jeffs B; Mtove G; Msuya W; Mndeme L; Mtei F; Chonya S; Reyburn H
Trop Med Int Health; 2008 Sep; 13(9):1213-9. PubMed ID: 18631307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A state-wide review of hospital postnatal care in Victoria, Australia: the views and experiences of midwives.
Rayner JA; Forster D; McLachlan H; Yelland J; Davey MA
Midwifery; 2008 Sep; 24(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 17270326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 'I'm just going to wash you down': sanitizing the vaginal examination.
Stewart M
J Adv Nurs; 2005 Sep; 51(6):587-94. PubMed ID: 16129009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Routine neonatal examination: effectiveness of trainee paediatrician compared with advanced neonatal nurse practitioner.
Lee TW; Skelton RE; Skene C
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2001 Sep; 85(2):F100-4. PubMed ID: 11517202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
