BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

488 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14738657)

  • 1. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after three consecutive negative Pap smears.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 14738657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives.
    Coldman A; Phillips N; Kan L; Matisic J; Benedet L; Towers L
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
    Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study of Pap test history and histologically determined cervical cancer in NSW women, 1997-2003.
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Wain G
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):190-6. PubMed ID: 16417696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The pap-smear history of women with invasive cervical squamous carcinoma. A case-control study from Sweden.
    Andersson-Ellström A; Seidal T; Grannas M; Hagmar B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Mar; 79(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10716304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk of invasive cervical cancer in relation to management of abnormal Pap smear results.
    Silfverdal L; Kemetli L; Andrae B; Sparén P; Ryd W; Dillner J; Strander B; Törnberg S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 201(2):188.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19560117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process.
    Leyden WA; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Mouchawar J; Bischoff K; Yood MU; Gilbert J; Taplin SH
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(9):675-83. PubMed ID: 15870438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The epidemiology of cervical neoplasia.
    La Vecchia C
    Biomed Pharmacother; 1985; 39(8):426-33. PubMed ID: 3841750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A case-control study of the protective benefit of cervical screening against invasive cervical cancer in NSW women.
    Yang B; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Roder D; Tracey E; Jelfs P
    Cancer Causes Control; 2008 Aug; 19(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 18286380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Papanicolaou smear screening interval and risk of cervical cancer.
    Shy K; Chu J; Mandelson M; Greer B; Figge D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Dec; 74(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 2586947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervicography: adjunctive cervical cancer screening by primary care clinicians.
    Ferris DG; Payne P; Frisch LE; Milner FH; diPaola FM; Petry LJ
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Aug; 37(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 8336097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in screening history, tumour characteristics and survival between women with screen-detected versus not screen-detected cervical cancer in the east of The Netherlands, 1992-2001.
    van der Aa MA; Schutter EM; Looijen-Salamon M; Martens JE; Siesling S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Aug; 139(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 18093720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improvement in protection against adenocarcinoma of the cervix resulting from participation in cervical screening.
    Mitchell H; Hocking J; Saville M
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):336-41. PubMed ID: 14681940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Review of the screening history of Alberta women with invasive cervical cancer.
    Stuart GC; McGregor SE; Duggan MA; Nation JG
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):513-9. PubMed ID: 9294389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of visual inspection and Papanicolau (PAP) smears for cervical cancer screening in Honduras: should PAP smears be abandoned?
    Perkins RB; Langrish SM; Stern LJ; Figueroa J; Simon CJ
    Trop Med Int Health; 2007 Sep; 12(9):1018-25. PubMed ID: 17875013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cytological history of cases of invasive cervical cancer diagnosed in France in 2006].
    Boulanger JC; Fauvet R; Urrutiaguer S; Drean Y; Sevestre H; Ganry O; Bergeron C; Gondry J
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Sep; 35(9):764-71. PubMed ID: 17765001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incidence of subsequent abnormal cytology in cervical cancer patients completing five-years of post treatment surveillance without evidence of recurrence.
    Orr JM; Barnett JC; Leath CA
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):501-4. PubMed ID: 21714992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.