BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

481 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14739889)

  • 1. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis.
    Himmlová L; Dostálová T; Kácovský A; Konvicková S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jan; 91(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 14739889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of Orbital Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Xing Z; Chen LS; Peng W; Chen LJ
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 28(2):e117-e120. PubMed ID: 28005657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of optimal taper of immediately loaded wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Shahmiri RA
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 21905902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional finite element analyses of four designs of a high-strength silicon nitride implant.
    Lin S; Shi S; LeGeros RZ; LeGeros JP
    Implant Dent; 2000; 9(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 11307234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Importance of diameter-to-length ratio in selecting dental implants: a methodological finite element study.
    Demenko V; Linetskiy I; Nesvit K; Hubalkova H; Nesvit V; Shevchenko A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 22616897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of platform switching on stress distribution in implants and periimplant bone studied by nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Liu S; Tang C; Yu J; Dai W; Bao Y; Hu D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1111-8. PubMed ID: 24882594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insertion torque of immediate wide-diameter implants: a finite element analysis.
    Atieh MA; Alsabeeha NH; Payne AG; Schwass DR; Duncan WJ
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Oct; 43(9):e115-26. PubMed ID: 23041998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of platform switching on implant crest bone stress: a finite element analysis.
    Schrotenboer J; Tsao YP; Kinariwala V; Wang HL
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):260-9. PubMed ID: 19509536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Single implant retained overdentures: Evaluation of effect of implant length and diameter on stress distribution by finite element analysis.
    Eraslan R; Yagci F; Esim E
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 33(4):348-357. PubMed ID: 37950537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in the mandible: a finite element study.
    Guan H; van Staden R; Loo YC; Johnson N; Ivanovski S; Meredith N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):866-76. PubMed ID: 19865627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone-implant interface with simulated insertion stress around an immediately loaded dental implant in the anterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Lee JS; Cho IH; Kim YS; Heo SJ; Kwon HB; Lim YJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 22442767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of the location and diameter of implants on the stress distribution in three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures under dynamic loads].
    Lü J; Liu C; Lan J; Gao X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 24437284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Triple Cylindrical Implant Design and a Conventional Cylindrical Implant Design on the Mandible by Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Bayrak A; Yaramanoğlu P; Kılıçarslan MA; Yaramanoğlu B; Akat B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 32142561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.