These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14739898)

  • 21. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology.
    Rudolph H; Luthardt RG; Walter MH
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 May; 37(5):579-87. PubMed ID: 16844107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient-specific polyetheretherketone facial implants in a computer-aided planning workflow.
    Guevara-Rojas G; Figl M; Schicho K; Seemann R; Traxler H; Vacariu A; Carbon CC; Ewers R; Watzinger F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 72(9):1801-12. PubMed ID: 24679957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II).
    Pfeiffer J
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jan; 2(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11351452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computer-aided design of facial prostheses by means of 3D-data acquisition and following symmetry analysis.
    Bockey S; Berssenbrügge P; Dirksen D; Wermker K; Klein M; Runte C
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 46(8):1320-1328. PubMed ID: 29866438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3D surface imaging in medicine: a review of working principles and implications for imaging the unsedated child.
    Riphagen JM; van Neck JW; van Adrichem LN
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):517-24. PubMed ID: 18362736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology.
    Moreno A; Giménez B; Özcan M; Pradíes G
    Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 23817542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CAD/CAM ear model and virtual construction of the mold.
    Ciocca L; Mingucci R; Gassino G; Scotti R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 18021820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quantitative measurement of volume changes induced by oral plastic surgery: validation of an optical method using different geometrically-formed specimens.
    Studer SP; Sourlier D; Wegmann U; Schärer P; Rees TD
    J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):950-62. PubMed ID: 9358361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adjustment of Cerec images or "the Cerec race track".
    Hehn S
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):137-49. PubMed ID: 11351492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An innovative method of ocular prosthesis fabrication by bio-CAD and rapid 3-D printing technology: A pilot study.
    Alam MS; Sugavaneswaran M; Arumaikkannu G; Mukherjee B
    Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):223-227. PubMed ID: 28375653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Integration of laser surface digitizing with CAD/CAM techniques for developing facial prostheses. Part 2: Development of molding techniques for casting prosthetic parts.
    Cheah CM; Chua CK; Tan KH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):543-8. PubMed ID: 14651243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improved Construction of Auricular Prosthesis by Digital Technologies.
    Nuseir A; Hatamleh M; Watson J; Al-Wahadni AM; Alzoubi F; Murad M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):e502-5. PubMed ID: 26221855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Use of digital technologies for nasal prosthesis manufacturing.
    Palousek D; Rosicky J; Koutny D
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Apr; 38(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 23798039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital image capture and rapid prototyping of the maxillofacial defect.
    Sabol JV; Grant GT; Liacouras P; Rouse S
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):310-4. PubMed ID: 21438958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The use of CT scan and stereo lithography apparatus technologies in a canine individualized rib prosthesis.
    Pan YQ; Zheng R; Liu FB; Jing W; Yong C; Liang XY; Bing W
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(5):71-5. PubMed ID: 24148795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fabrication of a wax ear by rapid-process modeling using stereolithography.
    Coward TJ; Watson RM; Wilkinson IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10196824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A novel computer-aided method to fabricate a custom one-piece glass fiber dowel-and-core based on digitized impression and crown preparation data.
    Chen Z; Li Y; Deng X; Wang X
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):276-83. PubMed ID: 24118182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technical report: precisely fitting bars on implants in five steps-a CAD/CAM concept for the edentulous mandible.
    Beuer F; Schweiger J; Huber M; Engels J; Stimmelmayr M
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 24417790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The optical Cerec impression--electronic model production.
    Wiedhahn K
    Int J Comput Dent; 1998 Sep; 1(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 11351459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study.
    Windisch SI; Jung RE; Sailer I; Studer SP; Ender A; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 17590160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.