138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14740674)
1. Hemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock-modified orifice bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
Levin FH; Buckley MJ; Austen WG
Circulation; 1978 Sep; 58(3 Pt 2):I33-5. PubMed ID: 14740674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hemodynamic and clinical comparison of the Hancock modified orifice and standard orifice bioprostheses in the aortic position.
Rossiter SJ; Miller DC; Stinson EB; Oyer PE; Reitz BA; Moreno-Cabral RJ; Mace JG; Robert EW; Tsagaris TJ; Sutton RB; Alderman EL; Shumway NE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Jul; 80(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 7382536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Current status of porcine heterograft prostheses: a 5-year appraisal.
Hannah H; Reis RL
Circulation; 1976 Dec; 54(6 Suppl):III27-31. PubMed ID: 1033047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hemodynamic function of the Hancock standard orifice aortic valve bioprosthesis.
Borkon AM; McIntosh CL; Jones M; Lipson LC; Kent KM; Morrow AG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Oct; 82(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 7278353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A pulsatile flow study comparing the Hancock porcine xenograft aortic valve prostheses models 242 and 250.
Wright JT
Med Instrum; 1977; 11(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 859469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses.
Ruzicka DJ; Hettich I; Hutter A; Bleiziffer S; Badiu CC; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R; Eichinger WB
Circulation; 2009 Sep; 120(11 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 19752359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hemodynamic evaluation of the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis in the small aortic anulus.
Wortham DC; Tri TB; Bowen TE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1981 Apr; 81(4):615-20. PubMed ID: 7206770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of prosthesis-patient mismatch on diastolic heart failure after aortic valve replacement.
Nozohoor S; Nilsson J; Lührs C; Roijer A; Sjögren J
Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Apr; 85(4):1310-7. PubMed ID: 18355517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hemodynamic evaluation of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses.
Levine FH; Carter JE; Buckley MJ; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
Circulation; 1981 Aug; 64(2 Pt 2):II192-5. PubMed ID: 7249322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna valve versus Medtronic Hancock II: a matched hemodynamic comparison.
Borger MA; Nette AF; Maganti M; Feindel CM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jun; 83(6):2054-8. PubMed ID: 17532395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Eight-year results after aortic valve replacement with the CryoLife-O'Brien Stentless Aortic Porcine Bioprosthesis.
Martinovic I; Farah I; Everlien M; Lindemann S; Knez I; Wittlinger T; Greve H; Vogt P
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Sep; 130(3):777-82. PubMed ID: 16153928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hemodynamic performance and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch of the complete supraannular perimount magna bioprosthesis in the aortic position.
Botzenhardt F; Eichinger WB; Guenzinger R; Bleiziffer S; Wagner I; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 53(4):226-30. PubMed ID: 16037868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm medtronic mosaic bioprosthesis.
Kirsch ME; Tzvetkov B; Vermes E; Pouzet B; Sauvat S; Loisance D
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 May; 14(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 15974539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis.
Becker RM; Strom J; Frishman W; Oka Y; Lin YT; Yellin EL; Frater RW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Oct; 80(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 7421295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis.
Seitelberger R; Bialy J; Gottardi R; Seebacher G; Moidl R; Mittelböck M; Simon P; Wolner E
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 15019661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Stentless bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement after a homograft root replacement: Toronto SPV implantation after a homograft root.
Bakaeen FG; Walkes JC; Reardon MJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Apr; 79(4):1397-9. PubMed ID: 15797091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical outcome of a simplified technique for aortic valve replacement with stentless bioprostheses.
Di Matteo G; Masala N; Swanevelder J; Davies J; Galiñanes M; Sosnowski AW
J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jan; 18(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19301562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
