BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14740930)

  • 1. Just noticeable differences of open quotient and asymmetry coefficient in singing voice.
    Henrich N; Sundin G; Ambroise D; d'Alessandro C; Castellengo M; Doval B
    J Voice; 2003 Dec; 17(4):481-94. PubMed ID: 14740930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Just noticeable differences for glottal flow waveform characteristics.
    Scherer RC; Arehart KH; Guo CG; Milstein CF; Horii Y
    J Voice; 1998 Mar; 12(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 9619976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changes in glottal contact quotient during resonance tube phonation and phonation with vibrato.
    Guzman M; Rubin A; Muñoz D; Jackson-Menaldi C
    J Voice; 2013 May; 27(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 23490123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Glottal open quotient in singing: measurements and correlation with laryngeal mechanisms, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency.
    Henrich N; D'Alessandro C; Doval B; Castellengo M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1417-30. PubMed ID: 15807029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensitivity of odd-harmonic amplitudes to open quotient and skewing quotient in glottal airflow.
    Titze IR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):502-4. PubMed ID: 25618080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variability in the relationships among voice quality, harmonic amplitudes, open quotient, and glottal area waveform shape in sustained phonation.
    Kreiman J; Shue YL; Chen G; Iseli M; Gerratt BR; Neubauer J; Alwan A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2625-32. PubMed ID: 23039455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective analysis of vocal warm-up with special reference to ergonomic factors.
    Vintturi J; Alku P; Lauri ER; Sala E; Sihvo M; Vilkman I
    J Voice; 2001 Mar; 15(1):36-53. PubMed ID: 12269633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
    Gaskill CS; Quinney DM
    J Voice; 2012 May; 26(3):e79-93. PubMed ID: 21550779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subglottal pressure and normalized amplitude quotient variation in classically trained baritone singers.
    Björkner E; Sundberg J; Alku P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):157-65. PubMed ID: 17114128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of lung volume on the glottal voice source.
    Iwarsson J; Thomasson M; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 1998 Dec; 12(4):424-33. PubMed ID: 9988029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency, intensity, and target matching effects on photoglottographic measures of open quotient and speed quotient.
    Hanson DG; Gerratt BR; Berke GS
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 2314084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Glottal volume velocity waveform characteristics in subjects with and without vocal training, related to gender, sound intensity, fundamental frequency, and age.
    Sulter AM; Wit HP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Nov; 100(5):3360-73. PubMed ID: 8914317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contact quotient versus closed quotient: a comparative study on professional male singers.
    Lã FM; Sundberg J
    J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 25510160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laryngeal stroboscopy-Normative values for amplitude, open quotient, asymmetry and phase difference in young adults.
    Sielska-Badurek EM; Jędra K; Sobol M; Niemczyk K; Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2019 Mar; 44(2):158-165. PubMed ID: 30353981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Approximations of open quotient and speed quotient from glottal airflow and EGG waveforms: effects of measurement criteria and sound pressure level.
    Sapienza CM; Stathopoulos ET; Dromey C
    J Voice; 1998 Mar; 12(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 9619977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Soft phonation in the male singing voice: a preliminary study.
    Miller DG; Schutte HK; Doing J
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):483-91. PubMed ID: 11792024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonatory Strategies of Male Vocalists in Singing Diatonic Scales With Various Dynamic Shapings.
    Vurma A
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):254.e17-254.e29. PubMed ID: 27469449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of an artificially lengthened vocal tract on estimated glottal contact quotient in untrained male voices.
    Gaskill CS; Erickson ML
    J Voice; 2010 Jan; 24(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 19135851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice Source Variation Between Vowels in Male Opera Singers.
    Sundberg J; Lã FM; Gill BP
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 26350698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic extremes of voice in the light of time domain parameters extracted from the amplitude features of glottal flow and its derivative.
    Vilkman E; Alku P; Vintturi J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2002; 54(3):144-57. PubMed ID: 12077506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.