148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14741014)
21. Fully automated molecular mechanics based induced fit protein-ligand docking method.
Koska J; Spassov VZ; Maynard AJ; Yan L; Austin N; Flook PK; Venkatachalam CM
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1965-73. PubMed ID: 18816046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Identification of near-native structures by clustering protein docking conformations.
Lorenzen S; Zhang Y
Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 17397057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multiple target screening method for robust and accurate in silico ligand screening.
Fukunishi Y; Mikami Y; Kubota S; Nakamura H
J Mol Graph Model; 2006 Sep; 25(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 16376595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimization and validation of a docking-scoring protocol; application to virtual screening for COX-2 inhibitors.
Mozziconacci JC; Arnoult E; Bernard P; Do QT; Marot C; Morin-Allory L
J Med Chem; 2005 Feb; 48(4):1055-68. PubMed ID: 15715473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Binding estimation after refinement, a new automated procedure for the refinement and rescoring of docked ligands in virtual screening.
Rastelli G; Degliesposti G; Del Rio A; Sgobba M
Chem Biol Drug Des; 2009 Mar; 73(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 19207463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance.
Perola E; Walters WP; Charifson PS
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(2):235-49. PubMed ID: 15211508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is it possible docking and scoring new ligands with few experimental data? Preliminary results on estrogen receptor as a case study.
Cozzini P; Dottorini T
Eur J Med Chem; 2004 Jul; 39(7):601-9. PubMed ID: 15236840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Normal mode-based approaches in receptor ensemble docking.
Cavasotto CN
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():157-68. PubMed ID: 22183536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints.
Renner S; Derksen S; Radestock S; Mörchen F
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):319-32. PubMed ID: 18211051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of scoring functions on enrichment in docking-based virtual screening: an application study on renin inhibitors.
Krovat EM; Langer T
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):1123-9. PubMed ID: 15154781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP.
Zacharias M
Proteins; 2004 Mar; 54(4):759-67. PubMed ID: 14997571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A fast protein-protein docking algorithm using series expansion in terms of spherical basis functions.
Sumikoshi K; Terada T; Nakamura S; Shimizu K
Genome Inform; 2005; 16(2):161-73. PubMed ID: 16901099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures.
Barril X; Morley SD
J Med Chem; 2005 Jun; 48(13):4432-43. PubMed ID: 15974595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: avoiding artificial enrichment.
Verdonk ML; Berdini V; Hartshorn MJ; Mooij WT; Murray CW; Taylor RD; Watson P
J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):793-806. PubMed ID: 15154744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Molecular modeling for screening environmental chemicals for estrogenicity: use of the toxicant-target approach.
Rabinowitz JR; Little SB; Laws SC; Goldsmith MR
Chem Res Toxicol; 2009 Sep; 22(9):1594-602. PubMed ID: 19715353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interpretation of scoring functions using 3D molecular fields. Mapping the diacyl-hydrazine-binding pocket of an insect ecdysone receptor.
Bordas B; Belai I; Lopata A; Szanto Z
J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):176-85. PubMed ID: 17238263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of scoring functions for protein--ligand docking.
Seifert MH
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):602-12. PubMed ID: 18293951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Consensus scoring with feature selection for structure-based virtual screening.
Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Feb; 48(2):288-95. PubMed ID: 18229906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Homology modeling of the serotonin 5-HT1A receptor using automated docking of bioactive compounds with defined geometry.
Nowak M; Kołaczkowski M; Pawłowski M; Bojarski AJ
J Med Chem; 2006 Jan; 49(1):205-14. PubMed ID: 16392805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
