BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14741229)

  • 1. Validation of a cardiac monitor for measuring heart rate variability in adult female pigs: accuracy, artefacts and editing.
    Marchant-Forde RM; Marlin DJ; Marchant JN
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Jan; 80(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 14741229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Polar® RS800CX heart rate monitor and electrocardiogram for measuring inter-beat intervals in healthy dogs.
    Essner A; Sjöström R; Ahlgren E; Gustås P; Edge-Hughes L; Zetterberg L; Hellström K
    Physiol Behav; 2015 Jan; 138():247-53. PubMed ID: 25446208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Polar 810s and an ambulatory ECG system for RR interval measurement during progressive exercise.
    Kingsley M; Lewis MJ; Marson RE
    Int J Sports Med; 2005; 26(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 15643533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of Elite-HRV Smartphone Application for Measuring Heart Rate Variability Compared to Polar V800 Heart Rate Monitor.
    Chhetri P; Shrestha L; Mahotra NB
    J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2022 Mar; 19(4):809-813. PubMed ID: 35615842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of time-domain short-term heart interval variability analysis using a wrist-worn heart rate monitor and the conventional electrocardiogram.
    Porto LG; Junqueira LF
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 19140912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor and comparison of artifact correction methods among adults with hypertension.
    Cilhoroz B; Giles D; Zaleski A; Taylor B; Fernhall B; Pescatello L
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240220. PubMed ID: 33031480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Possibilities and limitations of the Polar RS800 in measuring heart rate variability at rest.
    Wallén MB; Hasson D; Theorell T; Canlon B; Osika W
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2012 Mar; 112(3):1153-65. PubMed ID: 21766225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recording of ECG signals on a portable MiniDisc recorder for time and frequency domain heart rate variability analysis.
    Norman SE; Eager RA; Waran NK; Jeffery L; Schroter RC; Marlin DJ
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Jan; 83(5):729-38. PubMed ID: 15639158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of a heart rate monitor for calculating heart rate variability parameters in exercising horses.
    Frippiat T; van Beckhoven C; Moyse E; Art T
    J Equine Vet Sci; 2021 Sep; 104():103716. PubMed ID: 34416992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor to measure RR intervals at rest.
    Giles D; Draper N; Neil W
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2016 Mar; 116(3):563-71. PubMed ID: 26708360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity and reliability of Polar® RS800CX heart rate monitor, measuring heart rate in dogs during standing position and at trot on a treadmill.
    Essner A; Sjöström R; Ahlgren E; Lindmark B
    Physiol Behav; 2013 Apr; 114-115():1-5. PubMed ID: 23499770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paper electrocardiograph strips may contain overlooked clinical information in screen-detected type 2 diabetes patients.
    Fleischer J; Charles M; Tarnow L; Jensen KS; Nygaard H; Sandbaek A; Ejskjaer N
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Jan; 6(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 22401325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of 24-h heart rate variability in children.
    Bjelakovic B; Ilic D; Lukic S; Vukomanovic V; Zarko C; Stankovic Z; Marko J
    Clin Auton Res; 2017 Aug; 27(4):273-278. PubMed ID: 28667574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three mobile devices for measuring R-R intervals and heart rate variability: Polar S810i, Suunto t6 and an ambulatory ECG system.
    Weippert M; Kumar M; Kreuzfeld S; Arndt D; Rieger A; Stoll R
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2010 Jul; 109(4):779-86. PubMed ID: 20225081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the Reynolds Pathfinder II system for 24 h heart rate variability analysis.
    Mølgaard H
    Eur Heart J; 1991 Nov; 12(11):1153-62. PubMed ID: 1782942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Analysis of the Equivital EQ02 Lifemonitor with Holter Ambulatory ECG Device for Continuous Measurement of ECG, Heart Rate, and Heart Rate Variability: A Validation Study for Precision and Accuracy.
    Akintola AA; van de Pol V; Bimmel D; Maan AC; van Heemst D
    Front Physiol; 2016; 7():391. PubMed ID: 27708585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Heart Rate Variability During Exercise: A Comparison of Artefact Correction Methods.
    Giles DA; Draper N
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Mar; 32(3):726-735. PubMed ID: 29466273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of Heart Rate Monitor Polar RS800 for Heart Rate Variability Analysis During Exercise.
    Hernando D; Garatachea N; Almeida R; Casajús JA; Bailón R
    J Strength Cond Res; 2018 Mar; 32(3):716-725. PubMed ID: 27749728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of short-term heart-rate variability from the Polar S810.
    Nunan D; Donovan G; Jakovljevic DG; Hodges LD; Sandercock GR; Brodie DA
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Jan; 41(1):243-50. PubMed ID: 19092682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy and clinical utility of heart rate variability derived from a wearable heart rate monitor in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.
    Yang J; Ben-Menachem E
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2024 Apr; 38(2):433-443. PubMed ID: 37831376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.