BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14741633)

  • 1. Comparative hardness and modulus of tooth-colored restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation study.
    Yap AU; Wang X; Wu X; Chung SM
    Biomaterials; 2004 May; 25(11):2179-85. PubMed ID: 14741633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of aging on mechanical properties of composite restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation approach.
    Yap AU; Chung SM; Rong Y; Tsai KT
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 15470877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of in-office tooth whiteners on hardness of tooth-colored restoratives.
    Yap AU; Wattanapayungkul P
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 11933903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental degradation of glass-ionomer cements: a depth-sensing microindentation study.
    Wang XY; Yap AU; Ngo HC; Chung SM
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2007 Jul; 82(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 17034014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
    Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of bleaching agents on the surface hardness of tooth colored restorative materials.
    Taher NM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):18-26. PubMed ID: 15915201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of pH on the surface texture of glass ionomer based/containing restorative materials.
    Mohamed-Tahir MA; Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):586-91. PubMed ID: 15470882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of surface finish on indentation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives.
    Chung SM; Yap AU
    Dent Mater; 2005 Nov; 21(11):1008-16. PubMed ID: 16202447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of bleaching agents on the microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Mujdeci A; Gokay O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Apr; 95(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 16616125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of pH on the microhardness of resin-based restorative materials.
    Mohamed-Tahir MA; Tan HY; Woo AA; Yap AU
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):661-6. PubMed ID: 16268403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the effect of storage media on hardness and shear punch strength of tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Bagheri R; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 17993032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of early water exposure on the strength of glass ionomer restoratives.
    Wang XY; Yap AU; Ngo HC
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 17024947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temperature mediated coefficient of dimensional change of dental tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Sidhu SK; Carrick TE; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 15081549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physico-mechanical properties of a fast-set highly viscous GIC restorative.
    Yap AU; Pek YS; Cheang P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jan; 30(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12485377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Elastic modulus of resin-based dental restorative materials: a microindentation approach.
    Chung SM; Yap AU; Tsai KT; Yap FL
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2005 Feb; 72(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 15382031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study of the physical properties of a polyacid-modified composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Cattani-Lorente MA; Dupuis V; Moya F; Payan J; Meyer JM
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):21-32. PubMed ID: 10483392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.