307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14743526)
1. Polymerization contraction stress of resin composite restorations in a model Class I cavity configuration using photoelastic analysis.
Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(6):309-19. PubMed ID: 14743526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stresses in resin composite restorations.
Kinomoto Y; Torii M
J Dent; 1998 Mar; 26(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 9540314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of polymerization contraction stresses between self- and light-curing composites.
Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
J Dent; 1999 Jul; 27(5):383-9. PubMed ID: 10377614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
Yoshikawa T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
Dent Mater; 2001 Jul; 17(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 11356214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of incremental curing on contraction stresses associated with various resin composite buildups.
Tachibana K; Kuroe T; Tanino Y; Satoh N; Ohata N; Sano H; Caputo AA
Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 15119716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contraction stress and bond strength to dentinfor compatible and incompatible combinations of bonding systems and chemical and light-cured core build-up resin composites.
Bolhuis PB; de Gee AJ; Kleverlaan CJ; El Zohairy AA; Feilzer AJ
Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 16443265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations.
Roberts HW; Hermesch CB; Charlton DG
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11203830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of resin composite pins on the retention of class IV restorations.
Muhlbauer JA; Dunn WJ; Roberts HW; Murchison DF
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 12022461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volume of the internal gap formed under composite restorations in vitro.
Ciucchi B; Bouillaguet S; Delaloye M; Holz J
J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):305-12. PubMed ID: 9175362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Load-induced stresses in photoelastic primary canines with facial restorations.
Rabitz GK; Berson R; Caputo AA; Franklin RJ; Del Fierro DB
J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 17367035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
Malmström HS; Schlueter M; Roach T; Moss ME
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities.
Yoshikawa T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 11570686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of delayed light polymerization of a dual-cured composite base on marginal adaptation of class II posterior composite open-sandwich restoration.
Kamath U; Sheth H;
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):296. PubMed ID: 22945734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retentive strength of an amalgam bonding agent: chemical vs light vs dual curing.
Winkler MM; Rhodes B; Moore BK
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 11203863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
