These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14744051)

  • 1. Use of the VIP-Man model to calculate energy imparted and effective dose for x-ray examinations.
    Winslow M; Huda W; Xu XG; Chao TC; Shi CY; Ogden KM; Scalzetti EM
    Health Phys; 2004 Feb; 86(2):174-82. PubMed ID: 14744051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PATIENT DOSES IN COMMON DIAGNOSTIC X-RAY EXAMINATIONS.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Jul; 184(1):12-27. PubMed ID: 30289498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences in effective dose and energy imparted estimation from PA-AP, RLAT-LLAT projections in pediatric full spine x-ray examination using the Monte Carlo technique.
    Gialousis GI; Yakoumakis EN; Papadopoulou DI; Makri TK; Yakoumakis NE; Dimitriou PA; Georgiou EK
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16394339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
    Theocharopoulos N; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Varveris H; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2070-9. PubMed ID: 12349928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of newborn stylized and tomographic models for dose assessment in paediatric radiology.
    Staton RJ; Pazik FD; Nipper JC; Williams JL; Bolch WE
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Apr; 48(7):805-20. PubMed ID: 12701888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective dose reduction in spine radiographic imaging by choosing the less radiation-sensitive side of the body.
    Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Mosseri M; Avraham B; Leitner Y; Shabat S
    Spine J; 2016 Apr; 16(4):558-63. PubMed ID: 26704861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effective dose and energy imparted in diagnostic radiology.
    Huda W; Gkanatsios NA
    Med Phys; 1997 Aug; 24(8):1311-6. PubMed ID: 9284255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT.
    Huda W; Vance A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):540-6. PubMed ID: 17242266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective dose evaluation for chest and abdomen X-ray tests.
    Lee SC; Wang JN; Liu SC; Jiang SH
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 116(1-4 Pt 2):613-9. PubMed ID: 16604711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased radiation dose to overweight and obese patients from radiographic examinations.
    Yanch JC; Behrman RH; Hendricks MJ; McCall JH
    Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):128-39. PubMed ID: 19403846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Specific absorbed fractions for internal photon emitters calculated for a tomographic model of a pregnant woman.
    Shi CY; Xu XG; Stabin MG
    Health Phys; 2004 Nov; 87(5):507-11. PubMed ID: 15551788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient size and x-ray transmission in body CT.
    Ogden K; Huda W; Scalzetti EM; Roskopf ML
    Health Phys; 2004 Apr; 86(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 15057061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimated fluence-to-absorbed dose conversion coefficients for use in radiological protection of embryo and foetus against external exposure to photons from 50 keV to 10 GeV.
    Chen J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 16698964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Local diagnostic reference levels in standard X-ray examinations.
    Compagnone G; Pagan L; Bergamini C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15572400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning.
    Christner JA; Kofler JM; McCollough CH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):881-9. PubMed ID: 20308486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PATIENT RADIATION DOSE FROM CHEST X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN THE WEST BANK-PALESTINE.
    Lahham A; Issa A; ALMasri H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Feb; 178(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 28981835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Monte Carlo estimation of effective dose in chest tomosynthesis.
    Sabol JM
    Med Phys; 2009 Dec; 36(12):5480-7. PubMed ID: 20095260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neutron fluence-to-dose conversion coefficients for embryo and fetus.
    Chen J; Meyerhof D; Vlahovich S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 110(1-4):693-8. PubMed ID: 15353732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiation dose to premature infants in neonatal intensive care units in Kuwait.
    Brindhaban A; Al-Khalifah K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15266086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective dose and breast dose reduction in paediatric scoliosis X-ray radiography by an optimal positioning.
    Ben-Shlomo A; Bartal G; Shabat S; Mosseri M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013; 156(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 23511710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.