139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14744265)
1. Characteristics of demand oxygen delivery systems: maximum output and setting recommendations.
Bliss PL; McCoy RW; Adams AB
Respir Care; 2004 Feb; 49(2):160-5. PubMed ID: 14744265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maintaining oxygenation via demand oxygen delivery during rest and exercise.
Tiep BL; Barnett J; Schiffman G; Sanchez O; Carter R
Respir Care; 2002 Aug; 47(8):887-92. PubMed ID: 12162799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance comparison of 4 portable oxygen concentrators.
Chatburn RL; Williams TJ
Respir Care; 2010 Apr; 55(4):433-42. PubMed ID: 20406511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Efficacy of demand oxygen delivery systems in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease].
Johann U; Fichter J; Sybrecht GW
Pneumologie; 2001 Jun; 55(6):306-10. PubMed ID: 11458439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of six types of oxygen delivery devices at varying respiratory rates.
Wagstaff TA; Soni N
Anaesthesia; 2007 May; 62(5):492-503. PubMed ID: 17448063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Usefulness of demand oxygen delivery system for patients with chronic respiratory failure due to mainly tuberculosis sequelae].
Higashimoto Y; Machida K; Haga T
Kekkaku; 1990 Nov; 65(11):693-9. PubMed ID: 2277463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nocturnal oxygenation using a pulsed-dose oxygen-conserving device compared to continuous flow.
Chatburn RL; Lewarski JS; McCoy RW
Respir Care; 2006 Mar; 51(3):252-6. PubMed ID: 16533414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors affecting oxygen delivery with bi-level positive airway pressure.
Schwartz AR; Kacmarek RM; Hess DR
Respir Care; 2004 Mar; 49(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 14982647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated.
Sim MA; Dean P; Kinsella J; Black R; Carter R; Hughes M
Anaesthesia; 2008 Sep; 63(9):938-40. PubMed ID: 18540928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized crossover pilot study comparing the efficacy of an auto-demand oxygen delivery system with that of a conventional demand oxygen delivery system in patients with chronic respiratory failure.
Otoshi T; Nagano T; Murakami S; Omori T; Hazama D; Katsurada N; Yamamoto M; Tachihara M; Nishimura Y; Kobayashi K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Sep; 100(37):e27191. PubMed ID: 34664845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delivered oxygen concentrations using low-flow and high-flow nasal cannulas.
Wettstein RB; Shelledy DC; Peters JI
Respir Care; 2005 May; 50(5):604-9. PubMed ID: 15871753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The OxyArm - a new minimal contact oxygen delivery system for mouth or nose breathing.
Ling E; McDonald L; Dinesen TR; DuVall D
Can J Anaesth; 2002 Mar; 49(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 11861350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Recent technical advances in portable oxygen delivery systems].
Machida K; Kawabe Y; Mori M; Haga T
Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Aug; 30(8):1466-74. PubMed ID: 1434219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of the anatomic reservoir on low-flow oxygen delivery via nasal cannula: constant flow versus pulse flow with portable oxygen concentrator.
Zhou S; Chatburn RL
Respir Care; 2014 Aug; 59(8):1199-209. PubMed ID: 24803496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the efficacy of a demand oxygen delivery system with continuous low flow oxygen in subjects with stable COPD and severe oxygen desaturation on walking.
Roberts CM; Bell J; Wedzicha JA
Thorax; 1996 Aug; 51(8):831-4. PubMed ID: 8795673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Oxytron: a new device for administering oxygen in the spontaneously breathing patient].
Mertzlufft F; Heinrichs W; Dick W
Anaesthesist; 1989 Jun; 38(6):320-2. PubMed ID: 2764272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-concentration oxygen therapy via a demand oxygen delivery system.
Tiep BL; Nicotra MB; Carter R; Phillips R; Otsap B
Chest; 1985 May; 87(5):636-8. PubMed ID: 3921316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of supplemental oxygen delivery by continuous versus demand based flow systems in hypoxemic COPD patients - A randomized, single-blinded cross-over study.
Gloeckl R; Jarosch I; Schneeberger T; Fiedler C; Lausen M; Weingaertner J; Hitzl W; Kenn K; Koczulla AR
Respir Med; 2019 Sep; 156():26-32. PubMed ID: 31404750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of continuous flow versus demand oxygen delivery systems in patients with COPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gloeckl R; Osadnik C; Bies L; Leitl D; Koczulla AR; Kenn K
Respirology; 2019 Apr; 24(4):329-337. PubMed ID: 30556614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oxygen delivery using self-inflating resuscitation bags.
Carter BG; Fairbank B; Tibballs J; Hochmann M; Osborne A
Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2005 Mar; 6(2):125-8. PubMed ID: 15730596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
