281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14744303)
1. Guiding IRBs and educating researchers.
Wood J
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):W4. PubMed ID: 14744303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent to human subject research: improving the process of obtaining informed consent from mentally ill persons.
Derrickson D
Fordham Urban Law J; 1997; 25(1):143-65. PubMed ID: 12173638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework.
Ross LF
Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1997; 8(1):159-76. PubMed ID: 16528858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional review boards, research on children, and informed consent of parents: walking the tightrope between encouraging vital experimentation and protecting subjects' rights.
Katerberg RJ
J Coll Univ Law; 1998; 24(3):545-79. PubMed ID: 16331880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Widespread IRB-related compliance problems at research institution.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jan; 16(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 11855427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research.
Noah BA
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. University's Multiple Project Assurance (MPA) could be renewed for only short periods of time.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jul; 15(7):5-6. PubMed ID: 12199226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulating research with vulnerable populations: litigation gone awry.
Oldham JM; Haimowitz S; Delano SJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):154-73. PubMed ID: 15573435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Resuscitation research and consent: ethical and practical issues.
Bircher NG
Crit Care Med; 2003 May; 31(5 Suppl):S379-84. PubMed ID: 12771587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Protecting human research subjects: ten common problems.
Puglisi T
Health Law News; 2000 Jun; 13(3):8, 15. PubMed ID: 12542046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulation of research on the decisionally impaired: history and gaps in the current regulatory system.
Moreno JD
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 15573427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New human subject protection regulations are being delayed.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2005 Jan; 20(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15810181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Research administrator should not serve on institutional review board.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2002 Apr; 17(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 12374181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent for research in schizophrenia.: an alternative for special studies.
Posever TA; Chelmow T
IRB; 2001; 23(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 12530451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In harm's way: research subjects who are decisionally impaired.
Sundram CJ
J Health Care Law Policy; 1998; 1(1):36-65. PubMed ID: 15573429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. University admits research proceeded without review by an institutional review board (IRB).
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Apr; 18(4):6-7. PubMed ID: 14603944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional review board (IRB) violated numerous regulations.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):7-8. PubMed ID: 12530381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Model federal policy on protection of human subjects is now final.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1991 Aug; 6(8):1-3. PubMed ID: 16145785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pragmatism as a complementary approach to legislation: closing regulatory gaps in human subject research.
Vernillo A
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):15-7. PubMed ID: 19061099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
