96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14744310)
1. Knowing who you want to be when you grow up: implications for pediatric assent.
Sharp RR; Quigley RB
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):14-5. PubMed ID: 14744310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Children's consent to research participation: social context and personal experience invalidate fixed cutoff rules.
Ashcroft R; Goodenough T; Williamson E; Kent J
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):16-8. PubMed ID: 14744312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Why a teenager over age 14 should be able to consent, rather than merely assent, to participation as a human subject of research.
Toner K; Schwartz R
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):38-40. PubMed ID: 14744331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?
Wendler D; Shah S
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):1-7. PubMed ID: 14744301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Child assent revisited.
Ladd RE
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):37-8. PubMed ID: 14744329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Taking children seriously: what's so important about assent?
Diekema DS
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):25-6. PubMed ID: 14744318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Context in shaping the ability of a child to assent to research.
Fernandez CV
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):29-30. PubMed ID: 14744321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Altruism, children, and nonbeneficial research.
McGee EM
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):21-3. PubMed ID: 14744315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why shouldn't children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial medical research?
Halila R; Lötjönen S
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):35-6. PubMed ID: 14744327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A goodness-of-fit ethic for child assent to nonbeneficial research.
Fisher CB
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):27-8. PubMed ID: 14744320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Children under age 14 deserve more.
Taylor HA
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 14744324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The limits of altruism and arbitrary age limits.
Baylis F; Downie J
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):19-21. PubMed ID: 14744314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rethink "affirmative agreement," but abandon "assent".
Joffe S
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 14744308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A developmental approach to child assent for nontherapeutic research.
Miller VA; Nelson RM
J Pediatr; 2006 Jul; 149(1 Suppl):S25-30. PubMed ID: 16829238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preventing exploitation in pediatric research.
Botkin JR
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):31-2. PubMed ID: 14744322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Children's competence for assent and consent: a review of empirical findings.
Miller VA; Drotar D; Kodish E
Ethics Behav; 2004; 14(3):255-95. PubMed ID: 15875339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Children and adolescents' capacity to provide informed consent for participation in research.
Kuther TL; Posada M
Adv Psychol Res; 2004; 32():163-73. PubMed ID: 16986221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Omitted considerations and populations: a response to "Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?" by David Wendler and Seema Shah (AJOB 3:4).
Solyom AE
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):W39-40. PubMed ID: 15035946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The consent process and children.
Broome ME; Stieglitz KA
Res Nurs Health; 1992 Apr; 15(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 1565807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. We need substantive criteria for decisions by children.
Frader JE
Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(4):8-9. PubMed ID: 14744307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]