BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14745465)

  • 1. What drives children's limb selection for reaching in hemispace?
    Gabbard C; Helbig CR
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 14745465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Imagined and actual limb selection: a test of preference.
    Gabbard C; Rabb C
    Brain Cogn; 2001; 46(1-2):139-44. PubMed ID: 11527314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What determines limb selection for reaching?
    Helbig CR; Gabbard C
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2004 Mar; 75(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 15532361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural mechanisms of spatial stimulus-response compatibility: the effect of crossed-hand position.
    Matsumoto E; Misaki M; Miyauchi S
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 158(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 15029467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What determines choice of limb for unimanual reaching movements?
    Gabbard C; Rabb C
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Apr; 127(2):178-84. PubMed ID: 10843260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual cortex activation in kinesthetic guidance of reaching.
    Darling WG; Seitz RJ; Peltier S; Tellmann L; Butler AJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 179(4):607-19. PubMed ID: 17171536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attentional stimuli and programming hand selection: a developmental perspective.
    Gabbard C; Rabb C; Gentry V
    Int J Neurosci; 1998 Dec; 96(3-4):205-15. PubMed ID: 10069620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Task complexity and limb selection in reaching.
    Gabbard C; Tapia M; Helbig CR
    Int J Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 113(2):143-52. PubMed ID: 12751428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional effects on reaching in hemispace.
    Rabb C; Gabbard C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Apr; 88(2):701-2. PubMed ID: 10483666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Constraints on arm selection processes when reaching: degrees of freedom and joint amplitudes interact to influence limb selection.
    Kim W; Buchanan J; Gabbard C
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(5):403-11. PubMed ID: 21978264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preferential reaching across regions of hemispace in adults and children.
    Bryden PJ; Roy EA
    Dev Psychobiol; 2006 Mar; 48(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 16489592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.
    Goble DJ; Brown SH
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):693-704. PubMed ID: 17297548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Under what conditions will right-handers use their left hand? The effects of object orientation, object location, arm position, and task complexity in preferential reaching.
    Bryden PJ; Huszczynski J
    Laterality; 2011 Nov; 16(6):722-36. PubMed ID: 21391107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateralized effects on reaching by children.
    Gabbard C; Helbig CR; Gentry V
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2001; 19(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 11411421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Handedness results from complementary hemispheric dominance, not global hemispheric dominance: evidence from mechanically coupled bilateral movements.
    Woytowicz EJ; Westlake KP; Whitall J; Sainburg RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Aug; 120(2):729-740. PubMed ID: 29742023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anti-pointing is mediated by a perceptual bias of target location in left and right visual space.
    Heath M; Maraj A; Gradkowski A; Binsted G
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 192(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 18982320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple reference frames in neglect? An investigation of the object-centred frame and the dissociation between "near" and "far" from the body by use of a mirror.
    Laeng B; Brennen T; Johannessen K; Holmen K; Elvestad R
    Cortex; 2002 Sep; 38(4):511-28. PubMed ID: 12465666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of an orientation illusion on motor performance and motor imagery.
    Glover S; Dixon P; Castiello U; Rushworth MF
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 166(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16082537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of galvanic vestibular stimulation on egocentric and object-based mental transformations.
    Lenggenhager B; Lopez C; Blanke O
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 184(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17717649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual feedback alters the variations in corticospinal excitability that arise from rhythmic movements of the opposite limb.
    Carson RG; Welsh TN; Pamblanco-Valero MA
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 161(3):325-34. PubMed ID: 15517219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.