These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14746092)

  • 21. CQI (continuous quality improvement)--a step beyond QA.
    O'Leary DS
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1990; 10(2):2-3. PubMed ID: 10120675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accreditation decision process supports continuous operational improvement.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 14746097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Joint Commission launches Standards Improvement Initiative.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Oct; 26(10):1. PubMed ID: 17139923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. APPROVED: New preliminary denial of accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):7. PubMed ID: 20698090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accreditation nomenclature revised, survey report clarified.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1989; 9(3-4):6. PubMed ID: 10313768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Random unannounced surveys in 2001.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Jan; 21(1):5. PubMed ID: 11215070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How SII may affect your PPR.
    Joint Commission
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Oct; 28(10):1, 3. PubMed ID: 19133597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Showing improvement is a must for 1999 survey.
    OR Manager; 1998 Dec; 14(12):1, 10. PubMed ID: 10187725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preparing for Joint Commission survey can be fun.
    Thomas BL
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1993; 13(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 10130636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Team identifies ways to mitigate risks in new accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 14746096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Gearing up for the new accreditation process. Revised Joint Commission standards for 2004.
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2003 Mar; 20(3):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12621703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Expanded Joint Commission Corporate Scorecard addresses new accreditation process.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Aug; 24(8):12. PubMed ID: 15446576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. APPROVED: Decision rule for a preliminary denial of accreditation eliminated.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Dec; 29(12):4. PubMed ID: 20698087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Joint Commission improves accreditation process.
    Massaro RP
    Balance; 2001; 5(1):10, 13. PubMed ID: 11218900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Standards of patient care: the Joint Commission focus on nursing quality assurance.
    Patterson CH
    Nurs Clin North Am; 1988 Sep; 23(3):625-38. PubMed ID: 3166521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Unannounced surveys: a positive force.
    O'Leary DS
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1993; 13(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 10124477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. UPDATE: standards improvement initiative.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2007 Apr; 27(4):1, 3. PubMed ID: 17472125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preparing for a Joint Commission survey.
    Laramee SH
    Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 1997 Mar; 13(7):1, 6-7. PubMed ID: 10165205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Update on ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):15-30. PubMed ID: 10182300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Approved: additional unannounced survey exceptions and advance notice provision.
    Joint Commission
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2009 Mar; 29(3):3. PubMed ID: 19343991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.