These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14746095)
1. Pilot surveys put new process to the test. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 14746095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Selected surveys to include random "off shift" visits this year. Jt Comm Perspect; 2000; 20(2):7. PubMed ID: 11183162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. JCAHO's new accreditation process. Siegel S Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Nov; ():4-11. PubMed ID: 14651075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Unannounced survey process on track for full implementation in 2006. Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Jan; 25(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 16515353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequently asked questions about the unannounced survey process. Jt Comm Perspect; 2005 Sep; 25(9):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16515347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On-site survey brings Shared Vision-New Pathways to the heart of health care organizations. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 14746094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. JCAHO evaluation plan expanded for Shared Visions-New Pathways. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):24. PubMed ID: 14746101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Change in review of sentinel events during on-site surveys. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Nov; 24(11):4. PubMed ID: 15587169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. PFP Clinical/Service Groups and priority focus areas focus survey process. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):5-6, 25. PubMed ID: 14746092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the full Periodic Performance Review (PPR), Option 1, Option 2, and Option 3. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):8-9. PubMed ID: 15484654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of laptops continues in 1998. Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(5):6. PubMed ID: 10182302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Change in the process for organizations in which their survey reports meet a rule for conditional accreditation or preliminary denial of accreditation decision. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Sep; 24(9):7. PubMed ID: 15484653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Random unannounced surveys in 2001. Jt Comm Perspect; 2001 Jan; 21(1):5. PubMed ID: 11215070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Approved: elimination of one-year follow-up survey for certain organizations new to the accreditation/certification process. Joint Commission Jt Comm Perspect; 2008 Dec; 28(12):10. PubMed ID: 19186445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Team identifies ways to mitigate risks in new accreditation process. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 14746096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Special report--ORYX: the next evolution in accreditation. Joint Commission introduces new requirements to integrate performance measurement into accreditation process. Jt Comm Perspect; 1997; 17(1):26-7, 29. PubMed ID: 10346346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What to know about JCAHO. Joint Commission survey process changing this year. McLaughlin S Health Facil Manage; 2006 Mar; 19(3):35-7. PubMed ID: 16594493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Unannounced surveys: a positive force. O'Leary DS Jt Comm Perspect; 1993; 13(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 10124477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Accreditation decision process supports continuous operational improvement. Jt Comm Perspect; 2004 Jan; 24(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 14746097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Gearing up for the new accreditation process. Revised Joint Commission standards for 2004. Health Care Food Nutr Focus; 2003 Mar; 20(3):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12621703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]