125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14746327)
21. Recall of women in a cervical cytology screening programme. An estimate of the true rate of response.
Sansom CD; MacInerney J; Oliver V; Wakefield J; Yule R
Br J Prev Soc Med; 1975 Jun; 29(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 1182355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cervical cancer screening in England.
Patnick J
Eur J Cancer; 2000 Nov; 36(17):2205-8. PubMed ID: 11072205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Prospective randomised controlled trial of methods of call and recall for cervical cytology screening.
Pierce M; Lundy S; Palanisamy A; Winning S; King J
BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6692):160-2. PubMed ID: 2504359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The quality of smear taking training for hospital medical trainees.
Mokate T; Abidogun K; Watson AJ
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 17168919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Increased uptake of cervical screening by women with HIV infection in Auckland regardless of ethnicity, requirement for an interpreter or level of education.
Lowe M; Handy R; Ingram J; Nisbet M; Ritchie S; Thomas M; Briggs S
N Z Med J; 2016 Jul; 129(1438):22-31. PubMed ID: 27447132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Increasing the uptake of cervical smears: strategies implemented among general practitioners in Auckland.
White GE; McAvoy BR; Gleisner S
N Z Med J; 1993 Aug; 106(962):357-60. PubMed ID: 8255562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. General practitioner based screening for cervical cancer: higher participation of women with a higher risk?
Kant AC; Palm BT; Wentink E; van Weel C
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 9200061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does the offer of cervical screening with breast screening encourage older women to have a cervical smear test?
Lancaster G; Elton P
J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Oct; 46(5):523-7. PubMed ID: 1479324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Augmentation of Pap smear screening of high risk aboriginal women. Use of a computerised process tool within the Broome Aboriginal Medical Service.
Couzos S; Wronski I; Murray R; Cox H
Aust Fam Physician; 1998 Apr; 27(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 9581335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden.
Eaker S; Adami HO; Sparén P
Prev Med; 2001 Jun; 32(6):482-91. PubMed ID: 11394952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cervical cancer screening: women's knowledge, attitudes and preferences.
Nicoll PM; Narayan KV; Paterson JG
Health Bull (Edinb); 1991 May; 49(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 1917453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group.
Sasieni PD; Cuzick J; Lynch-Farmery E
Br J Cancer; 1996 Apr; 73(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 8611418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cervical cytology in the Vale of Trent faculty of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1985-8.
Wilson A
BMJ; 1990 Feb; 300(6721):376-8. PubMed ID: 2106993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Questionnaire survey of women aged 56-59 years: consultations in general practice, use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and participation in screening programmes.
Seamark C; Blake S
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care; 2002 Jan; 28(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 16259809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The efficacy of a national Family Health Services Authority based cervical cytology system.
Amery J; Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
Health Trends; 1992; 24(4):119-22. PubMed ID: 10123981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
