These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14746868)

  • 1. An electrophysiological investigation of memory encoding, depth of processing, and word frequency in humans.
    Guo C; Zhu Y; Ding J; Fan S; Paller KA
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Feb; 356(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 14746868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ERPs predictive of subsequent recall and recognition performance.
    Paller KA; McCarthy G; Wood CC
    Biol Psychol; 1988 Jun; 26(1-3):269-76. PubMed ID: 3207786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual priming versus explicit memory: dissociable neural correlates at encoding.
    Schott B; Richardson-Klavehn A; Heinze HJ; Düzel E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 May; 14(4):578-92. PubMed ID: 12126499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Depth of processing effects on neural correlates of memory encoding: relationship between findings from across- and within-task comparisons.
    Otten LJ; Henson RN; Rugg MD
    Brain; 2001 Feb; 124(Pt 2):399-412. PubMed ID: 11157567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissecting gamma frequency activity during human memory processing.
    Kucewicz MT; Berry BM; Kremen V; Brinkmann BH; Sperling MR; Jobst BC; Gross RE; Lega B; Sheth SA; Stein JM; Das SR; Gorniak R; Stead SM; Rizzuto DS; Kahana MJ; Worrell GA
    Brain; 2017 May; 140(5):1337-1350. PubMed ID: 28335018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition memory for studied words is determined by cortical activation differences at encoding but not during retrieval.
    Chee MW; Goh JO; Lim Y; Graham S; Lee K
    Neuroimage; 2004 Aug; 22(4):1456-65. PubMed ID: 15275903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False memory and level of processing effect: an event-related potential study.
    Beato MS; Boldini A; Cadavid S
    Neuroreport; 2012 Sep; 23(13):804-8. PubMed ID: 22811058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: insights from ERP studies.
    Kissler J; Assadollahi R; Herbert C
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():147-83. PubMed ID: 17015079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Event-related rTMS at encoding affects differently deep and shallow memory traces.
    Innocenti I; Giovannelli F; Cincotta M; Feurra M; Polizzotto NR; Bianco G; Cappa SF; Rossi S
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):325-30. PubMed ID: 20601000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinguishing source memory and item memory: brain potentials at encoding and retrieval.
    Guo C; Duan L; Li W; Paller KA
    Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 1118(1):142-54. PubMed ID: 16978588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlates of implicit memory for words and faces in event-related brain potentials.
    Boehm SG; Sommer W; Lueschow A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Jan; 55(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 15598520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.
    Voss JL; Paller KA
    Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ERP profiles for face and word recognition are based on their status in semantic memory not their stimulus category.
    Nie A; Griffin M; Keinath A; Walsh M; Dittmann A; Reder L
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1557():66-73. PubMed ID: 24530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval of concrete words involves more contextual information than abstract words: multiple components for the concreteness effect.
    Xiao X; Zhao D; Zhang Q; Guo CY
    Brain Lang; 2012 Mar; 120(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 22041121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Left temporal and temporoparietal brain activity depends on depth of word encoding: a magnetoencephalographic study in healthy young subjects.
    Walla P; Hufnagl B; Lindinger G; Imhof H; Deecke L; Lang W
    Neuroimage; 2001 Mar; 13(3):402-9. PubMed ID: 11170806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Word Processing differences between dyslexic and control children.
    Paul I; Bott C; Wienbruch C; Elbert TR
    BMC Psychiatry; 2006 Jan; 6():5. PubMed ID: 16441886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrical neuroimaging of memory discrimination based on single-trial multisensory learning.
    Thelen A; Cappe C; Murray MM
    Neuroimage; 2012 Sep; 62(3):1478-88. PubMed ID: 22609795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Electrophysiologic dissociations in memory encoding of abstract and concrete words].
    Mecklinger A; Friederici AD
    Z Exp Psychol; 1997; 44(1):62-81. PubMed ID: 9498924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task-dependent modulation of word processing mechanisms during modified visual search tasks.
    Dampure J; Benraiss A; Vibert N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(6):1145-63. PubMed ID: 26176489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repetition-priming modulates category-related effects on event-related potentials: further evidence for multiple cortical semantic systems.
    Kiefer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Feb; 17(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 15811233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.