297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14747762)
1. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors.
Gwiazda J; Weber C
Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of aberrometry-based relative peripheral refraction measurements.
Berntsen DA; Mutti DO; Zadnik K
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 18201339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cycloplegic refraction between Grand Seiko autorefractor and Retinomax autorefractor in the Vision in Preschoolers-Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Study.
Ying GS; Maguire MG; Kulp MT; Ciner E; Moore B; Pistilli M; Candy R;
J AAPOS; 2017 Jun; 21(3):219-223.e3. PubMed ID: 28528993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open versus closed view autorefraction in young adults.
Nagra M; Akhtar A; Huntjens B; Campbell P
J Optom; 2021; 14(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 32792330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repeatability and Validity of Peripheral Refraction with Two Different Autorefractors.
Morrison AM; Mutti DO
Optom Vis Sci; 2020 Jun; 97(6):429-439. PubMed ID: 32511165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children.
Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia.
Cervino A; Hosking SL; Rai GK; Naroo SA; Gilmartin B
J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):795-803. PubMed ID: 17061717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of a traditional and wavefront autorefraction.
Lebow KA; Campbell CE
Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1191-8. PubMed ID: 25198541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predicting ocular residual astigmatism using corneal and refractive parameters: a myopic eye study.
Park CY; Oh JH; Chuck RS
Curr Eye Res; 2013 Aug; 38(8):851-61. PubMed ID: 23621376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in Children and Adolescents.
Xiong S; Lv M; Zou H; Zhu J; Lu L; Zhang B; Deng J; Yao C; He X; Xu X
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):894-902. PubMed ID: 28816868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Refractive outcomes of table-mounted and hand-held auto-refractometers in children: an observational cross-sectional study.
Karabulut M; Karabulut S; Karalezli A
BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):424. PubMed ID: 34879852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of refractive value and pupil size under monocular and binocular conditions between the Spot Vision Screener and binocular open-field autorefractor.
Satou T; Takahashi Y; Niida T
Strabismus; 2020 Dec; 28(4):186-193. PubMed ID: 33063575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction.
Nguyen MT; Berntsen DA
Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):886-893. PubMed ID: 28727613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population.
Kumar RS; Moe CA; Kumar D; Rackenchath MV; A V SD; Nagaraj S; Wittberg DM; Stamper RL; Keenan JD
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251583. PubMed ID: 34010350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid?
Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of autorefractors using the image-size principle in determining on-axis and off-axis refraction. Part 2: Theoretical study of peripheral refraction with the Grand Seiko AutoRef/Keratometer WAM-5500.
Atchison DA; Suheimat M; Zacharovas S; Campbell CE
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Mar; 42(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 34927744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of refractive error measurements by three different models of autorefractors and subjective refraction in young adults.
Wosik J; Patrzykont M; Pniewski J
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2019 Apr; 36(4):B1-B6. PubMed ID: 31044948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
