These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14748035)
1. Bayesian methods for analysis of binary outcome data in cluster randomized trials on the absolute risk scale. Thompson SG; Warn DE; Turner RM Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):389-410. PubMed ID: 14748035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Constructing intervals for the intracluster correlation coefficient using Bayesian modelling, and application in cluster randomized trials. Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1443-56. PubMed ID: 16220510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bayesian methods of analysis for cluster randomized trials with count outcome data. Clark AB; Bachmann MO Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 19856321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Warn DE; Thompson SG; Spiegelhalter DJ Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1601-23. PubMed ID: 12111922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Single patient (n-of-1) trials with binary treatment preference. Schluter PJ; Ware RS Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2625-36. PubMed ID: 16118811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjusted intraclass correlation coefficients for binary data: methods and estimates from a cluster-randomized trial in primary care. Yelland LN; Salter AB; Ryan P; Laurence CO Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 21335589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the risk difference, risk ratio and odds ratio scales for quantifying the unadjusted intervention effect in cluster randomized trials. Ukoumunne OC; Forbes AB; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5143-55. PubMed ID: 18613226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials. Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods. Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes. Austin PC Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported. Campbell MK; Grimshaw JM; Elbourne DR BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Apr; 4():9. PubMed ID: 15115554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials. Nixon RM; Thompson SG Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes. Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Strategies for analyzing multilevel cluster-randomized studies with binary outcomes collected at varying intervals of time. Olsen MK; DeLong ER; Oddone EZ; Bosworth HB Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6055-71. PubMed ID: 18825655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials. Ukoumunne OC Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling risk when binary outcomes are subject to error. McInturff P; Johnson WO; Cowling D; Gardner IA Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(7):1095-109. PubMed ID: 15057880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multilevel modelling of clustered grouped survival data using Cox regression model: an application to ART dental restorations. Wong MC; Lam KF; Lo EC Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(3):447-57. PubMed ID: 16143989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian variable selection method for censored survival data. Faraggi D; Simon R Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1475-85. PubMed ID: 9883546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]