These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14748273)

  • 1. A place for criminal law in the regulation of reproductive technologies.
    Campbell A
    Health Law J; 2002; 10():77-101. PubMed ID: 14748273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Defining a policy rationale for the criminal regulation of reproductive technologies.
    Campbell A
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 15739314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clones, controversy, and criminal law: a comment on the proposal for legislation governing assisted human reproduction.
    Caulfield T
    Alta Law Rev; 2001 Sep; 39(2):335-45. PubMed ID: 12611408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clones, controversy, confusion and criminal law: a reply to Professor Caulfield.
    Anand S
    Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 16211738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Politics, prohibitions and the lost public perspective: a comment on Bill C-56: the Assisted Human Reproduction Act.
    Caulfield T
    Alta Law Rev; 2002 Sep; 40(2):451-63. PubMed ID: 16211737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wrestling with the limits of law: regulating new reproductive technologies.
    Young AH; Wasunna A
    Health Law J; 1998; 6 Spec No():239-77. PubMed ID: 14746068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An overview of assisted reproductive technology regulation in Australia and New Zealand.
    Skene L
    Tex Int Law J; 2000; 35(1):31-49. PubMed ID: 12656083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproductive and therapeutic cloning, germline therapy, and purchase of gametes and embryos: comments on Canadian legislation governing reproduction technologies.
    Bernier L; Grégoire D
    J Med Ethics; 2004 Dec; 30(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 15574437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Canadian regulation of assisted reproductive technologies?
    Baylis F
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2001; 31(4):8. PubMed ID: 12945459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wombs for rent: an examination of prohibitory and regulatory approaches to governing preconception arrangements.
    Chen M
    Health Law Can; 2003 Feb; 23(3):33-50. PubMed ID: 12674583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulating a revolution: the extent of reproductive rights in Canada.
    Washenfelder C
    Health Law Rev; 2003; 12(2):44-52. PubMed ID: 15742499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regulating NRGTs (new reproductive and genetic technologies): is criminalization the solution for Canada?
    Caulfield T; Hirtle M; Le Bris S
    Health Law Can; 1997 Aug; 18(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 10178192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The right to privacy and assisted reproductive technologies: a comparative study of the law of Germany and the U.S.
    Voss AS
    N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 2002; 21(2):229-305. PubMed ID: 15212072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [2/6 The regulatory framework for medically-assisted reproduction].
    Ponte C
    Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2010; (253):45-6. PubMed ID: 20402112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary on Canadian proposals.
    Morgan D
    Bull Med Ethics; 1992 Sep; (81):13-5. PubMed ID: 15997537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction.
    Boggio A
    Hum Reprod; 2005 May; 20(5):1153-7. PubMed ID: 15790606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technologies in Nigeria: placing the law above medical technology.
    Koyonda SO
    Comp Int Law J South Afr; 2001 Jul; 34(2):258-79. PubMed ID: 12755144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Asking the inconceivable? Ethical and legal considerations regarding HIV-seropositive couples' request to access assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): a Canadian perspective.
    Lentz VJ
    Health Law J; 2008; 16():237-80. PubMed ID: 19536983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
    Cherry AL
    Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach.
    Sedillo Lopez A
    Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.