These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14748273)

  • 21. The children of ART (assisted reproductive technology): should the law protect them from harm?
    Rosato JL
    Utah Law Rev; 2004; 2004(1):57-110. PubMed ID: 16755703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The law of February 19th 2004, No. 40: procreation and punishment.
    Canestrari S
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2005; (22):57-73. PubMed ID: 16385790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Beyond conception: legal determinations of filiation in the context of assisted reproductive technologies.
    Mykitiuk R
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 2001; 39(4):771-815. PubMed ID: 16528850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assisted reproductive technologies and the pitfalls of unregulated biomedical innovation.
    Noah L
    Fla Law Rev; 2003 Apr; 55(2):603-65. PubMed ID: 15212032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The case for regulating collaborative reproduction: a children's rights perspective.
    Alvare HM
    Harvard J Legis; 2003; 40(1):1-63. PubMed ID: 15212033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Privacy and assisted human reproduction: a discussion paper.
    Foster J; Slater B
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 15739319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genetic technologies and the regulation of reproductive decision-making in Australia.
    Karpin I; Bennett B
    J Law Med; 2006 Aug; 14(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 16937786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reviewing regulation of assisted reproductive technology in New South Wales: the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW).
    Smith M
    J Law Med; 2008 Aug; 16(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 18807800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Looking to Europe: something's changed in Italy.
    Crosignani PG
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2005 Jun; 8(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 16192090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The new Italian law on assisted reproduction technology (Law 40/2004).
    Fineschi V; Neri M; Turillazzi E
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Sep; 31(9):536-9. PubMed ID: 16131556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Canada's Assisted Human Reproductive Act: is it scientific censorship, or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies?
    Rasmussen C
    Sask Law Rev; 2004; 67(1):97-135. PubMed ID: 16485361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of the federal government in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Lal M
    Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 1997; 13(2):517-43. PubMed ID: 16528854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Regulation of assisted reproductive technologies in the United States.
    Adamson D
    Fam Law Q; 2005; 39(3):727-44. PubMed ID: 16610154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Submission on draft legislation on assisted human reproduction.
    Canadian Bar Association. National Health Law and Family Law Sections
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 10(2):25-9. PubMed ID: 15739308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [The bioethics law revision: comparative analysis of contributions from different public and professional offices. Assisted Reproductive Technology, embryo and stem cells research, umbilical cord blood bank].
    Merviel P; Cabry R; Lourdel E; Brasseur F; Devaux A; Copin H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2009 Sep; 37(9):733-41. PubMed ID: 19665913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multifetal pregnancy reduction in assisted reproductive technologies: a license to kill?
    Khanijou S
    DePaul J Health Care Law; 2005; 8(2):403-30. PubMed ID: 16538758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Brickbats and bouquets for the draft legislation on assisted human reproduction.
    Baylis F
    Health Law Rev; 2001; 10(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 15739304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Catholic teaching and the law concerning the new reproductive technologies.
    Alvare HM
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2002 Nov; 30(1):107-34. PubMed ID: 15868664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regulatory approaches to reproductive genetic testing.
    Knoppers BM; Isasi RM
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Dec; 19(12):2695-701. PubMed ID: 15388677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bill C-13 The Assisted Human Reproduction Act: examining the arguments against a regulatory approach.
    Caulfield T
    Health Law Rev; 2002; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 15739313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.