These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14748492)

  • 1. QMLE: fast, robust, and efficient estimation of distribution functions based on quantiles.
    Brown S; Heathcote A
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2003 Nov; 35(4):485-92. PubMed ID: 14748492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions.
    Heathcote A; Brown S; Mewhort DJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 12120806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. QMPE: estimating Lognormal, Wald, and Weibull RT distributions with a parameter-dependent lower bound.
    Heathcote A; Brown S; Cousineau D
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 May; 36(2):277-90. PubMed ID: 15354694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comment on Heathcote, Brown, and Mewhort's QMLE method for response time distributions.
    Speckman PL; Rouder JN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Jun; 11(3):574-6; discussion 577-8. PubMed ID: 15376813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Structural equation models of latent interactions: evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction.
    Marsh HW; Wen Z; Hau KT
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):275-300. PubMed ID: 15355150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the informational value of parameter estimates in cognitive models.
    Verguts T; Storms G
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 15190694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical Bayes Gaussian likelihood estimation of exposure distributions from pooled samples in human biomonitoring.
    Li X; Kuk AY; Xu J
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(28):4999-5014. PubMed ID: 25213192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Generalized linear mixed quantile regression with panel data.
    Lu X; Fan Z
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237326. PubMed ID: 32780767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of performance in nonlinear estimation tasks: prediction of estimation performance at low signal-to-noise ratio.
    Müller SP; Abbey CK; Rybicki FJ; Moore SC; Kijewski MF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3697-715. PubMed ID: 16077222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nearly unbiased estimators for the three-parameter Weibull distribution with greater efficiency than the iterative likelihood method.
    Cousineau D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):167-91. PubMed ID: 18177546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantile modeling through multivariate log-normal/independent linear regression models with application to newborn data.
    Morán-Vásquez RA; Mazo-Lopera MA; Ferrari SLP
    Biom J; 2021 Aug; 63(6):1290-1308. PubMed ID: 33949715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CDF-quantile distributions for modelling random variables on the unit interval.
    Smithson M; Shou Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):412-438. PubMed ID: 28306155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer program for the proportional hazards measurement error model.
    Nakamura T; Akazawa K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 Nov; 45(3):203-12. PubMed ID: 7705078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Matlab function to estimate choice model parameters from paired-comparison data.
    Wickelmaier F; Schmid C
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Feb; 36(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 15190697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Parametric and nonparametric population methods: their comparative performance in analysing a clinical dataset and two Monte Carlo simulation studies.
    Bustad A; Terziivanov D; Leary R; Port R; Schumitzky A; Jelliffe R
    Clin Pharmacokinet; 2006; 45(4):365-83. PubMed ID: 16584284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unbiased and efficient log-likelihood estimation with inverse binomial sampling.
    van Opheusden B; Acerbi L; Ma WJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1008483. PubMed ID: 33362195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity analysis for high quantiles of ochratoxin A exposure distribution.
    Albert I; Gauchi JP
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2002 May; 75(1-2):143-55. PubMed ID: 11999111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimates of error probability for complex Gaussian channels with generalized likelihood ratio detection.
    Devore MD
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Oct; 27(10):1580-91. PubMed ID: 16237993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fast maximum likelihood estimation using continuous-time neural point process models.
    Lepage KQ; MacDonald CJ
    J Comput Neurosci; 2015 Jun; 38(3):499-519. PubMed ID: 25788412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. GFREG: a computer program for maximum likelihood regression using the Generalized F distribution.
    Hogg SA; Ciampi A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1985 Jul; 20(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 3848369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.