These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14748969)

  • 21. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
    Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fads and foibles in ART: where is the evidence?
    Hartshorne GM; Baker H
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2006 Mar; 9(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 16581719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of a quality management system in improving patient safety - laboratory aspects.
    Allen LC
    Clin Biochem; 2013 Sep; 46(13-14):1187-93. PubMed ID: 23648455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The assisted reproductive technology laboratory: toward evidence-based practice?
    Sunde A; Balaban B
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):310-8. PubMed ID: 23905707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies: world report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2007.
    Ishihara O; Adamson GD; Dyer S; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Feb; 103(2):402-13.e11. PubMed ID: 25516078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implementation of cleanroom technology in reproductive laboratories: the question is not why but how.
    Esteves SC; Bento FC
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2016 Jan; 32(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 26602944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality management systems in ART: are they really needed? An Australian clinic's experience.
    Warnes GM; Norman RJ
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Feb; 21(1):41-55. PubMed ID: 17085076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2003.
    Wright VC; Chang J; Jeng G; Macaluso M
    MMWR Surveill Summ; 2006 May; 55(4):1-22. PubMed ID: 16723970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of current and forthcoming European legislation and standardization on the setting of quality specifications by laboratories.
    Haeckel R; Kindler M
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1999 Nov; 59(7):569-73. PubMed ID: 10667701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART) world report: assisted reproductive technology 2004.
    Sullivan EA; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2013 May; 28(5):1375-90. PubMed ID: 23442757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lack of standardization in performance of the semen analysis among laboratories in the United States.
    Keel BA; Stembridge TW; Pineda G; Serafy NT
    Fertil Steril; 2002 Sep; 78(3):603-8. PubMed ID: 12215340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comprehensive assessment of cryogenic storage risk and quality management concerns: best practice guidelines for ART labs.
    Schiewe MC; Freeman M; Whitney JB; VerMilyea MD; Jones A; Aguirre M; Leisinger C; Adaniya G; Synder N; Chilton R; Behnke EJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jan; 36(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 30232640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Response to article -- 'A critical assessment of the impact of the European Union Tissues and Cell Directive (2004) on laboratory practices in assisted conception' by David Mortimer.
    Saunders D; Pope A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Oct; 11(4):407-8. PubMed ID: 16274595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of 36 assisted reproduction laboratories monitoring environmental conditions and instrument parameters using the same quality-control application.
    Palmer GA; Kratka C; Szvetecz S; Fiser G; Fiser S; Sanders C; Tomkin G; Szvetecz MA; Cohen J
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Jul; 39(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 31126717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A quality management approach to controlled ovarian stimulation in assisted reproductive technology: the "Fischer protocol".
    Fischer R; Nakano FY; Roque M; Bento FC; Baukloh V; Esteves SC
    Panminerva Med; 2019 Mar; 61(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 30674180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A critical assessment of the impact of the European Union Tissues and Cells Directive (2004) on laboratory practices in assisted conception.
    Mortimer D
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2005 Aug; 11(2):162-76. PubMed ID: 16168210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Quality improvement of medical diagnostic laboratories].
    Horváth AR; Endröczi E; Mikó T
    Orv Hetil; 2003 Jul; 144(28):1389-95. PubMed ID: 12914124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Traceability as a unique tool to improve standardization in laboratory medicine.
    Panteghini M
    Clin Biochem; 2009 Mar; 42(4-5):236-40. PubMed ID: 19863912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review.
    Morbeck DE
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2015 Jul; 32(7):1019-24. PubMed ID: 26238385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
    Okun N; Sierra S; ;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.