616 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14749021)
1. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 1998 to 2000.
Marks JG; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Rietschel RL; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS;
Am J Contact Dermat; 2003 Jun; 14(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 14749021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period.
Pratt MD; Belsito DV; DeLeo VA; Fowler JF; Fransway AF; Maibach HI; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Rietschel RL; Sasseville D; Sherertz EF; Storrs FJ; Taylor JS; Zug K
Dermatitis; 2004 Dec; 15(4):176-83. PubMed ID: 15842061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.
Krob HA; Fleischer AB; D'Agostino R; Haverstock CL; Feldman S
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):349-53. PubMed ID: 15337975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.
Zug KA; McGinley-Smith D; Warshaw EM; Taylor JS; Rietschel RL; Maibach HI; Belsito DV; Fowler JF; Storrs FJ; DeLeo VA; Marks JG; Mathias CG; Pratt MD; Sasseville D
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Oct; 144(10):1329-36. PubMed ID: 18936397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing trends and allergens in the patch test standard series: a mayo clinic 5-year retrospective review, january 1, 2001, through december 31, 2005.
Davis MD; Scalf LA; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; El-Azhary RA; Rohlinger AL; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL; Connolly SM
Arch Dermatol; 2008 Jan; 144(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 18209170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of previously patch-tested patients referred to a contact dermatitis clinic.
Soni BP; Sherertz EF
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Mar; 8(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 9066841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patch test results from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 1998-2000.
Wetter DA; Davis MD; Yiannias JA; Cheng JF; Connolly SM; el-Azhary RA; Farmer SA; Fett DD; Johnson JS; Linehan DL; Richardson DM; Schroeter AL
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Sep; 53(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 16112346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. European Standard Series patch test results from a contact dermatitis clinic in Israel during the 7-year period from 1998 to 2004.
Lazarov A
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Aug; 55(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 16930229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of patch testing patients with a scattered generalized distribution of dermatitis: retrospective cross-sectional analyses of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001 to 2004.
Zug KA; Rietschel RL; Warshaw EM; Belsito DV; Taylor JS; Maibach HI; Mathias CG; Fowler JF; Marks JG; DeLeo VA; Pratt MD; Sasseville D; Storrs FJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Sep; 59(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 18597890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Common contact sensitizers in the Czech Republic. Patch test results in 12,058 patients with suspected contact dermatitis*.
Machovcova A; Dastychova E; Kostalova D; Vojtechovska A; Reslova J; Smejkalova D; Vaneckova J; Vocilkova A
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Sep; 53(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 16128756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch testing reactions to a standard series in 608 patients tested from 1990 to 1997 at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Albert MR; González S; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1998 Dec; 9(4):207-11. PubMed ID: 9810020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens.
Saripalli YV; Achen F; Belsito DV
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2003 Jul; 49(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12833010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patch test results with the metalworking fluid series of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG).
Geier J; Lessmann H; Dickel H; Frosch PJ; Koch P; Becker D; Jappe U; Aberer W; Schnuch A; Uter W
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Sep; 51(3):118-30. PubMed ID: 15479200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature.
de Waard-van der Spek FB; Oranje AP
Dermatology; 2009; 218(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 18946202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patch test sensitization to Compositae mix, sesquiterpene-lactone mix, Compositae extracts, laurel leaf, Chlorophorin, Mansonone A, and dimethoxydalbergione.
Kanerva L; Estlander T; Alanko K; Jolanki R
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 11244135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Concomitant positive reactions to allergens in a patch testing standard series from 1988-1997.
Albert MR; Chang Y; González E
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 10594298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contact sensitivity in patients with leg ulcerations: a North American study.
Saap L; Fahim S; Arsenault E; Pratt M; Pierscianowski T; Falanga V; Pedvis-Leftick A
Arch Dermatol; 2004 Oct; 140(10):1241-6. PubMed ID: 15492187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Results of patch testing to personal care product allergens in a standard series and a supplemental cosmetic series: an analysis of 945 patients from the Mayo Clinic Contact Dermatitis Group, 2000-2007.
Wetter DA; Yiannias JA; Prakash AV; Davis MD; Farmer SA; el-Azhary RA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2010 Nov; 63(5):789-98. PubMed ID: 20643495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
