These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. The IFRA: working towards the continually-improved safety of fragrance ingredients and the importance of a partnership with the dermatological community. Vey MG J Drugs Dermatol; 2004; 3(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 15176164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Can the epoxides of cinnamyl alcohol and cinnamal show new cases of contact allergy? Hagvall L; Niklasson IB; Luthman K; Karlberg AT Contact Dermatitis; 2018 Jun; 78(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 29603274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Categorization of fragrance contact allergens for prioritization of preventive measures: clinical and experimental data and consideration of structure-activity relationships. Uter W; Johansen JD; Börje A; Karlberg AT; Lidén C; Rastogi S; Roberts D; White IR Contact Dermatitis; 2013 Oct; 69(4):196-230. PubMed ID: 23889298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fragrance contact dermatitis in Korea: a joint study. An S; Lee AY; Lee CH; Kim DW; Hahm JH; Kim KJ; Moon KC; Won YH; Ro YS; Eun HC Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 53(6):320-3. PubMed ID: 16364118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patch testing in children--recommendations of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG). Worm M; Aberer W; Agathos M; Becker D; Brasch J; Fuchs T; Hillen U; Höger P; Mahler V; Schnuch A; Szliska C; J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2007 Feb; 5(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 17274776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Recommendation to include methyldibromo glutaronitrile in the European standard patch test series. Bruze M; Goossens A; Gruvberger B; ; Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 15701126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Allergic and photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen: results of (photo) patch testing and follow-up of 42 patients. Devleeschouwer V; Roelandts R; Garmyn M; Goossens A Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 18279154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Frequency of allergic contact dermatitis to isoeugenol is increasing: a review of 3636 patients tested from 2001 to 2005. White JM; White IR; Glendinning A; Fleming J; Jefferies D; Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Buckley DA Br J Dermatol; 2007 Sep; 157(3):580-2. PubMed ID: 17573874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is it really fragrance-free? Scheinman PL Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Dec; 8(4):239-42. PubMed ID: 9358119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The diagnostic value of patch tests with two fragrance mix I preparations for detection of clinically relevant perfume allergy. Schollhammer L; Andersen KE; Mortz CG Contact Dermatitis; 2012 Jun; 66(6):350-2. PubMed ID: 22568848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Thresholds of elicitation depend on induction conditions. Could low level exposure induce sub-clinical allergic states that are only elicited under the severe conditions of clinical diagnosis? Hostynek JJ; Maibach HI Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Nov; 42(11):1859-65. PubMed ID: 15350684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative patch and repeated open application testing in hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde sensitive-patients. Schnuch A; Uter W; Dickel H; Szliska C; Schliemann S; Eben R; Ruëff F; Gimenez-Arnau A; Löffler H; Aberer W; Frambach Y; Worm M; Niebuhr M; Hillen U; Martin V; Jappe U; Frosch PJ; Mahler V Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Sep; 61(3):152-62. PubMed ID: 19780773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy. Brasch J; Schnuch A; Uter W; Allergy; 2006 Mar; 61(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 16436147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]