These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14749628)

  • 1. Unnecessary cesarean delivery in Louisiana: an analysis of birth certificate data.
    Kabir AA; Steinmann WC; Myers L; Khan MM; Herrera EA; Yu S; Jooma N
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 190(1):10-9; discussion 3A. PubMed ID: 14749628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Racial differences in cesareans: an analysis of U.S. 2001 National Inpatient Sample Data.
    Kabir AA; Pridjian G; Steinmann WC; Herrera EA; Khan MM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):710-8. PubMed ID: 15802395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimating the proportion of unnecessary Cesarean sections in Ohio using birth certificate data.
    Koroukian SM; Trisel B; Rimm AA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 51(12):1327-34. PubMed ID: 10086827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Declining trends in cesarean deliveries, Ohio 1989-1996: an analysis by indications.
    Koroukian SM; Rimm AA
    Birth; 2000 Mar; 27(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 10865555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Primary and Repeat Cesarean Deliveries: A Population-based Study in the United States, 1979-2010.
    Ananth CV; Friedman AM; Keyes KM; Lavery JA; Hamilton A; Wright JD
    Epidemiology; 2017 Jul; 28(4):567-574. PubMed ID: 28346271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cesarean delivery among women with low-risk pregnancies: a comparison of birth certificates and hospital discharge data.
    Kahn EB; Berg CJ; Callaghan WM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 113(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19104357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variations in Low-Risk Cesarean Delivery Rates in the United States Using the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Definition.
    Ouyang L; Cox S; Ferre C; Xu L; Sappenfield WM; Barfield W
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 139(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 34991146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean Delivery Trends Among Patients at Low Risk for Cesarean Delivery in the US, 2000-2019.
    Frappaolo AM; Logue TC; Goffman D; Nathan LM; Sheen JJ; Andrikopoulou M; Wen T; D'Alton ME; Friedman AM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e235428. PubMed ID: 36988955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audit of cesarean delivery in Burkina Faso.
    Kouanda S; Coulibaly A; Ouedraogo A; Millogo T; Meda BI; Dumont A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 24629788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Cesarean delivery rate and indications in mainland China: a cross sectional study in 2011].
    Hou L; Li G; Zou L; Li C; Chen Y; Yuan Y; Wang X; Jia C; Zhang W
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 49(10):728-35. PubMed ID: 25537242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surveillance of cesarean section deliveries, New Jersey, 1999-2004.
    Denk CE; Kruse LK; Jain NJ
    Birth; 2006 Sep; 33(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 16948720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rate of cesarean delivery at hospitals providing emergency obstetric care in Bangladesh.
    Islam MT; Yoshimura Y
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 128(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 25257570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway.
    Kolås T; Hofoss D; Daltveit AK; Nilsen ST; Henriksen T; Häger R; Ingemarsson I; Øian P
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 188(4):864-70. PubMed ID: 12712077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Rates and Medical Necessity of Cesarean Delivery in the Era of the Two-Child Policy in Hubei and Gansu Provinces, China.
    Liao Z; Zhou Y; Li H; Wang C; Chen D; Liu J
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Mar; 109(3):476-482. PubMed ID: 30676790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maternal risk factor index and cesarean delivery among women with nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex deliveries, Texas, 2015.
    Salahuddin M; Mandell DJ; Lakey DL; Eppes CS; Patel DA
    Birth; 2019 Mar; 46(1):182-192. PubMed ID: 30198160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recent trends in caesarean delivery rates and indications for caesarean delivery in Canada.
    Liu S; Rusen ID; Joseph KS; Liston R; Kramer MS; Wen SW; Kinch R;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2004 Aug; 26(8):735-42. PubMed ID: 15307978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hospital-Level Variation in the Frequency of Cesarean Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Who Undergo Labor Induction.
    Main EK; Chang SC; Cheng YW; Rosenstein MG; Lagrew DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 136(6):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 33156193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mode of delivery after a previous cesarean birth, and associated maternal and neonatal morbidity.
    Young CB; Liu S; Muraca GM; Sabr Y; Pressey T; Liston RM; Joseph KS;
    CMAJ; 2018 May; 190(18):E556-E564. PubMed ID: 29735533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of detailed maternal ethnicity on cesarean delivery: findings from the U.S. birth certificate in the State of Massachusetts.
    Edmonds JK; Hawkins SS; Cohen BB
    Birth; 2014 Sep; 41(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 24750358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of trends in cesarean delivery in Paraguay between 1995 and 2008.
    Yuen J; Painter I; Abraham L; Melian M; Denno DM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Sep; 126(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 24972720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.