These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14750733)

  • 1. Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States.
    Seigneur C; Vijayaraghavan K; Lohman K; Karamchandani P; Scott C
    Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Jan; 38(2):555-69. PubMed ID: 14750733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contributions of global and regional sources to mercury deposition in New York State.
    Seigneur C; Lohman K; Vijayaraghavan K; Shia RL
    Environ Pollut; 2003; 123(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 12667764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the effect of spatial resolution on atmospheric mercury modeling.
    Seigneur C; Karamchandani P; Vijayaraghavan K; Lohman K; Shia RL; Levin L
    Sci Total Environ; 2003 Mar; 304(1-3):73-81. PubMed ID: 12663173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Source attribution for mercury deposition in the contiguous United States: regional difference and seasonal variation.
    Lin CJ; Shetty SK; Pan L; Pongprueksa P; Jang C; Chu HW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Jan; 62(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 22393810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Arctic atmospheric mercury: Sources and changes.
    Dastoor A; Wilson SJ; Travnikov O; Ryjkov A; Angot H; Christensen JH; Steenhuisen F; Muntean M
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 839():156213. PubMed ID: 35623517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trend analysis from 1970 to 2008 and model evaluation of EDGARv4 global gridded anthropogenic mercury emissions.
    Muntean M; Janssens-Maenhout G; Song S; Selin NE; Olivier JG; Guizzardi D; Maas R; Dentener F
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():337-50. PubMed ID: 25068706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A review of studies on atmospheric mercury in China.
    Fu X; Feng X; Sommar J; Wang S
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Apr; 421-422():73-81. PubMed ID: 22134034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are mercury emissions from geologic sources significant? A status report.
    Gustin MS
    Sci Total Environ; 2003 Mar; 304(1-3):153-67. PubMed ID: 12663180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Study of atmospheric mercury budget in East Asia using STEM-Hg modeling system.
    Pan L; Lin CJ; Carmichael GR; Streets DG; Tang Y; Woo JH; Shetty SK; Chu HW; Ho TC; Friedli HR; Feng X
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Jul; 408(16):3277-91. PubMed ID: 20483447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atmospheric mercury in the Canadian Arctic. Part II: insight from modeling.
    Dastoor A; Ryzhkov A; Durnford D; Lehnherr I; Steffen A; Morrison H
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Mar; 509-510():16-27. PubMed ID: 25604938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observed decrease in atmospheric mercury explained by global decline in anthropogenic emissions.
    Zhang Y; Jacob DJ; Horowitz HM; Chen L; Amos HM; Krabbenhoft DP; Slemr F; St Louis VL; Sunderland EM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jan; 113(3):526-31. PubMed ID: 26729866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconciling models and measurements to assess trends in atmospheric mercury deposition.
    Sunderland EM; Cohen MD; Selin NE; Chmura GL
    Environ Pollut; 2008 Nov; 156(2):526-35. PubMed ID: 18299164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling the atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes.
    Cohen M; Artz R; Draxler R; Miller P; Poissant L; Niemi D; Ratté D; Deslauriers M; Duval R; Laurin R; Slotnick J; Nettesheim T; McDonald J
    Environ Res; 2004 Jul; 95(3):247-65. PubMed ID: 15220060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of contaminated sites to the global mercury budget.
    Kocman D; Horvat M; Pirrone N; Cinnirella S
    Environ Res; 2013 Aug; 125():160-70. PubMed ID: 23489984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A diagnostic evaluation of modeled mercury wet depositions in Europe using atmospheric speciated high-resolution observations.
    Bieser J; De Simone F; Gencarelli C; Geyer B; Hedgecock I; Matthias V; Travnikov O; Weigelt A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2014; 21(16):9995-10012. PubMed ID: 24764005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Atmospheric mercury deposition to Lake Michigan during the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study.
    Landis MS; Keeler GJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2002 Nov; 36(21):4518-24. PubMed ID: 12433159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Atmospheric mercury deposition and its contribution of the regional atmospheric transport to mercury pollution at a national forest nature reserve, southwest China.
    Ma M; Wang D; Du H; Sun T; Zhao Z; Wei S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Dec; 22(24):20007-18. PubMed ID: 26298336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An assessment of anthropogenic source impacts on mercury cycling in the Willamette Basin, Oregon, USA.
    Hope BK
    Sci Total Environ; 2006 Mar; 356(1-3):165-91. PubMed ID: 15899511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impacts of the Minamata convention on mercury emissions and global deposition from coal-fired power generation in Asia.
    Giang A; Stokes LC; Streets DG; Corbitt ES; Selin NE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5326-35. PubMed ID: 25851589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Influence of Climate Change on Atmospheric Deposition of Mercury in the Arctic—A Model Sensitivity Study.
    Hansen KM; Christensen JH; Brandt J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Sep; 12(9):11254-68. PubMed ID: 26378551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.