These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Place-pitch sensitivity and its relation to consonant recognition by cochlear implant listeners using the MPEAK and SPEAK speech processing strategies. Donaldson GS; Nelson DA J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1645-58. PubMed ID: 10738818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bilateral cochlear implants controlled by a single speech processor. Lawson DT; Wilson BS; Zerbi M; van den Honert C; Finley CC; Farmer JC; McElveen JT; Roush PA Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):758-61. PubMed ID: 9831150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV S Afr J Commun Disord; 1996; 43():27-40. PubMed ID: 9265842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. Dillier N; Battmer RD; Döring WH; Müller-Deile J Audiology; 1995; 34(3):145-59. PubMed ID: 8561692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization. Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. Nelson DA; Van Tasell DJ; Schroder AC; Soli S; Levine S J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency discrimination and speech recognition by patients who use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-implant signal processors. Dorman MF; Smith LM; Smith M; Parkin JL J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1174-84. PubMed ID: 8609301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vowel and consonant identification tests can be used to compare performances in a multilingual group of cochlear implant patients. Pelizzone M; Boëx C; Montandon P ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1993; 55(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 8265119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of stimulation rate on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Friesen LM; Shannon RV; Cruz RJ Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(3):169-84. PubMed ID: 15724088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spread of excitation and channel interaction in single- and dual-electrode cochlear implant stimulation. Snel-Bongers J; Briaire JJ; Vanpoucke FJ; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 22048258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]