These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Psychological adaptations and emotional observations of eight multichannel cochlear implant patients. Degive C; Archinard M ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):317-9. PubMed ID: 1475102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A case study of a 4-year-old perilingual deaf child implanted with an Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Montandon P; Kasper A; Pelizzone M ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1991; 53(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 1795917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech recognition with a CIS strategy for the ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Boëx C; Pelizzone M; Montandon P Am J Otol; 1996 Jan; 17(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 8694136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. First field trials with a portable CIS processor for the Ineraid multichannel cochlear implant. Pelizzone M; Boëx-Spano C; Sigrist A; François J; Tinembart J; Degive C; Montandon P Acta Otolaryngol; 1995 Sep; 115(5):622-8. PubMed ID: 8928633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Chorimac 12. A multichannel intracochlear implant for total deafness. Chouard CH; Fugain C; Meyer B; Chabolle F Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):355-70. PubMed ID: 3520444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Case report: top hearing performances of a postlingually deaf cochlear implant user. Bucher PO; Mathis A; De Min N; Arnold W ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):320-3. PubMed ID: 1475103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of prelingually and postlingually deaf patients using single-channel or multichannel cochlear implants. Hinderink JB; Mens LH; Brokx JP; van den Broek P Laryngoscope; 1995 Jun; 105(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 7769946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results with the currently used cochlear implant. Ito J; Takagi A; Kawano M; Takahashi H; Honjo I Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():298-300. PubMed ID: 7668678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of channel-to-electrode mappings on speech reception with the ineraid cochlear implant. Rabinowitz WM; Eddington DK Ear Hear; 1995 Oct; 16(5):450-8. PubMed ID: 8654900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary results with the Clarion cochlear implant in postlingually deaf adults. Gantz BJ; Tyler RS; Woodworth G Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1995 Sep; 166():268-9. PubMed ID: 7668664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frequency discrimination and speech recognition by patients who use the Ineraid and continuous interleaved sampling cochlear-implant signal processors. Dorman MF; Smith LM; Smith M; Parkin JL J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Feb; 99(2):1174-84. PubMed ID: 8609301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experience with the multichannel intracochlear nucleus mini device in 24 postlingually deaf patients. Babighian G; Dominguez M; Amadori M; Pàntano N; Tomasi P; Babighian S Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):184-6. PubMed ID: 8205981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Intelligibility of the Patient's Speech Predicts the Likelihood of Cochlear Implant Success in Prelingually Deaf Adults. van Dijkhuizen JN; Boermans PP; Briaire JJ; Frijns JH Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):e302-10. PubMed ID: 26928004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]