160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14751907)
21. [The CONSORT statenent: Revised Recommendations For Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials].
Moher D; Schulz KF; Altman DG;
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 25(7):658-61. PubMed ID: 16089150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Trend in methodological quality of randomised clinical trials in low back pain.
Koes BW; Malmivaara A; van Tulder MW
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Aug; 19(4):529-39. PubMed ID: 15949774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders.
Gummesson C; Atroshi I; Ekdahl C
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Jul; 29(4):727-34; discussion 735-7. PubMed ID: 15249101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The CONSORT statement: Progress in clinical research in pediatric surgery.
Moss RL
J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Dec; 36(12):1739-42. PubMed ID: 11733895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Surgical randomized-controlled trials and CONSORT 2010.
Knobloch K
Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):633-4; author reply 634-5. PubMed ID: 21263307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessing the quality of reports of randomised trials: implications for the conduct of meta-analyses.
Moher D; Cook DJ; Jadad AR; Tugwell P; Moher M; Jones A; Pham B; Klassen TP
Health Technol Assess; 1999; 3(12):i-iv, 1-98. PubMed ID: 10374081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Lessons from and cautions about noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials.
Gøtzsche PC
JAMA; 2006 Mar; 295(10):1172-4. PubMed ID: 16522840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. CONSORT and clinical trial reporting: room for improvement.
Heddle NM; Ness PM
Transfusion; 2016 Apr; 56(4):781-3. PubMed ID: 27079308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. CONSORT 2010.
Lancet; 2010 Apr; 375(9721):1136. PubMed ID: 20338630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The quest for unbiased research: randomized clinical trials and the CONSORT reporting guidelines.
Schulz KF
Ann Neurol; 1997 May; 41(5):569-73. PubMed ID: 9153517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reporting the results of randomized clinical trials: a priority of Archives of Ophthalmology.
Beck RW
Arch Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 122(7):1038-9. PubMed ID: 15249369
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [CONSORT statement. Revised findings on quality improvement based on reports from randomized studies in parallel design].
Moher D; Schulz KF; Altman DG;
Schmerz; 2005 Apr; 19(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 15700113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Control of bias in randomized controlled trials published in prosthodontic journals.
Dumbrigue HB; Jones JS; Esquivel JF
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 11753309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Critical appraisal. 5. Randomised controlled trials: questions for valid evidence.
Nelson EA
NT Learn Curve; 1999 Jul; 3(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 10795227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopaedics.
Dulai SK; Slobogean BL; Beauchamp RD; Mulpuri K
J Pediatr Orthop; 2007; 27(5):573-81. PubMed ID: 17585270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Improving clinical trials in dentistry.
Giannobile WV
J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3 Suppl):6S-7S. PubMed ID: 25710898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Randomized controlled trials in pediatric urology: room for improvement.
Welk B; Afshar K; MacNeily AE
J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):306-9; discussion 309-10. PubMed ID: 16753430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Randomized clinical trials in surgery: why do we need them?
Balch CM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 Aug; 132(2):241-2. PubMed ID: 16872941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Low quality of reporting adverse drug reactions in paediatric randomised controlled trials.
de Vries TW; van Roon EN
Arch Dis Child; 2010 Dec; 95(12):1023-6. PubMed ID: 20551194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed.
Dechartres A; Charles P; Hopewell S; Ravaud P; Altman DG
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 20705426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
