168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14752003)
1. Optimizing substitution matrices by separating score distributions.
Hourai Y; Akutsu T; Akiyama Y
Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 20(6):863-73. PubMed ID: 14752003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimizing amino acid substitution matrices with a local alignment kernel.
Saigo H; Vert JP; Akutsu T
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 7():246. PubMed ID: 16677385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved pairwise alignments of proteins in the Twilight Zone using local structure predictions.
Huang YM; Bystroff C
Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 22(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 16352653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A metric model of amino acid substitution.
Xu W; Miranker DP
Bioinformatics; 2004 May; 20(8):1214-21. PubMed ID: 14871874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fold-specific substitution matrices for protein classification.
Vilim RB; Cunningham RM; Lu B; Kheradpour P; Stevens FJ
Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 20(6):847-53. PubMed ID: 14764567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A generalized affine gap model significantly improves protein sequence alignment accuracy.
Zachariah MA; Crooks GE; Holbrook SR; Brenner SE
Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 15562515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aligning protein sequence and analysing substitution pattern using a class-specific matrix.
Xu HS; Ren WK; Liu XH; Li XQ
J Biosci; 2010 Jun; 35(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 20689185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PFASUM: a substitution matrix from Pfam structural alignments.
Keul F; Hess M; Goesele M; Hamacher K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jun; 18(1):293. PubMed ID: 28583067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pairwise statistical significance and empirical determination of effective gap opening penalties for protein local sequence alignment.
Agrawal A; Brendel VP; Huang X
Int J Comput Biol Drug Des; 2008; 1(4):347-67. PubMed ID: 20063463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the significance of sequence alignments when using multiple scoring matrices.
Frommlet F; Futschik A; Bogdan M
Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 20(6):881-7. PubMed ID: 14751984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of protein quaternary structure with support vector machine.
Zhang SW; Pan Q; Zhang HC; Zhang YL; Wang HY
Bioinformatics; 2003 Dec; 19(18):2390-6. PubMed ID: 14668222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting secondary structures of proteins. Recognizing properties of amino acids with the logical analysis of data algorithm.
Błazewicz J; Hammer PL; Lukasiak P
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2005; 24(3):88-94. PubMed ID: 15971846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Robust sequence alignment using evolutionary rates coupled with an amino acid substitution matrix.
Ndhlovu A; Hazelhurst S; Durand PM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():255. PubMed ID: 26269100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protein database searches using compositionally adjusted substitution matrices.
Altschul SF; Wootton JC; Gertz EM; Agarwala R; Morgulis A; Schäffer AA; Yu YK
FEBS J; 2005 Oct; 272(20):5101-9. PubMed ID: 16218944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of protein secondary structure based on residue pairs.
Liu X; Zhang LM; Zheng WM
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2004 Jun; 2(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 15297986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relation between weight matrix and substitution matrix: motif search by similarity.
Zheng WM
Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):938-43. PubMed ID: 15514002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effectiveness of position- and composition-specific gap costs for protein similarity searches.
Stojmirović A; Gertz EM; Altschul SF; Yu YK
Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 24(13):i15-23. PubMed ID: 18586708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ProClust: improved clustering of protein sequences with an extended graph-based approach.
Pipenbacher P; Schliep A; Schneckener S; Schönhuth A; Schomburg D; Schrader R
Bioinformatics; 2002; 18 Suppl 2():S182-91. PubMed ID: 12386002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical evaluation of pairwise protein sequence comparison with the Bayesian bootstrap.
Price GA; Crooks GE; Green RE; Brenner SE
Bioinformatics; 2005 Oct; 21(20):3824-31. PubMed ID: 16105900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of word composition distances for the recognition of SCOP relationships.
Vinga S; Gouveia-Oliveira R; Almeida JS
Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 14734312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
