These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14752196)

  • 1. Long-term retention of mammographic computer-assisted diagnosis information is neither necessary nor desirable.
    Guenin M
    Radiology; 2004 Feb; 230(2):595-6; author reply 596-7. PubMed ID: 14752196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Pros and cons of early cancer detection in breast carcinoma].
    Callies R; Oberhoff C
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2005 Apr; 147(14):30-2. PubMed ID: 15887680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
    Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mammography].
    Fischer U
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2003 Sep; 145(37):66-7. PubMed ID: 14584453
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Use of computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) and tele-mammography in preventive breast cancer screening].
    Schneider W; Heinlein P; Drexl J; Gössler A
    Rontgenpraxis; 2002; 54(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 12051081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mammographic CAD markings: archive or discard?
    Berlin L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):W659. PubMed ID: 21512059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer-aided detection in mammography.
    Astley SM; Gilbert FJ
    Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 15081844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues.
    Baker JA; Lo JY; Delong DM; Floyd CE
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 15358850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The mammographic image of benign breast diseases].
    Friedrich M
    Gynakologe; 1989 Aug; 22(4):230-7. PubMed ID: 2676758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Reading screening mammograms with the help of neural networks].
    Karssemeijer N; Veldkamp WJ; te Brake GM; Hendriks JH
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Nov; 143(45):2232-6. PubMed ID: 10578420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Breast cancer serial examination of the population with mammographic and clinical method (author's transl)].
    Péntek Z; Balogh J; Futár M; Juhász B
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1974; 15(5):599-607. PubMed ID: 4465861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using "voting" in CAD for mammography to lower false-positive rates.
    Prizemin Y
    Radiol Manage; 2010; 32(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 22279723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the effect of computer-aided detection on the sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Sacks WM
    Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):597-8; author reply 598-9. PubMed ID: 12563163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of single and clustered microcalcifications in mammograms using fractals models and neural networks.
    Bocchi L; Coppini G; Nori J; Valli G
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 May; 26(4):303-12. PubMed ID: 15121055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current challenges of full field digital mammography.
    Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H; Van Steen A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 16461520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Mammography--why and when].
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1984 Jan; 146(3):202-4. PubMed ID: 6701984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hormone replacement therapy, percent mammographic density, and sensitivity of mammography.
    Kavanagh AM; Cawson J; Byrnes GB; Giles GG; Marr G; Tong B; Gertig DM; Hopper JL
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1060-4. PubMed ID: 15894653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term risk of false-positive screening results and subsequent biopsy as a function of mammography use.
    Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Kopans DB; Moore R; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Smith BL; Tanabe KK; Michaelson JS
    Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):335-42. PubMed ID: 16864665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.