These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14752196)

  • 21. Mammography and malpractice.
    Potchen EJ; Bisesi MA; Sierra AE; Potchen JE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):475-80. PubMed ID: 1741799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Risk of developing breast cancer in relation to findings at mammography].
    Witt I; Hansen HS; Brünner S
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1983 Jan; 145(4):237-9. PubMed ID: 6845482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CAD systems for mammography: a real opportunity? A review of the literature.
    Bazzocchi M; Mazzarella F; Del Frate C; Girometti R; Zuiani C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Apr; 112(3):329-53. PubMed ID: 17440698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do non-specific minimal signs in a biennial mammographic breast cancer screening programme need further diagnostic assessment?
    Maes RM; Dronkers DJ; Hendriks JH; Thijssen MA; Nab HW
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Jan; 70():34-38. PubMed ID: 9059292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Nonspecific findings confound screening for breast cancer.
    Wagner SK
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 2000 Mar; 22(3):41-2, 45-6. PubMed ID: 10947282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Radiologic analysis of known-interval cancers after 2 years of organized mass screening for breast cancer in Ille-et-Vilaine].
    de Korvin B; Courtel ML; Bohec C; Durand G; Piette C; Le Frêche JN; Duvauferrier R; Ramée A
    J Radiol; 1998 Nov; 79(11):1379-86. PubMed ID: 9846291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimal cancer of the breast: diagnosis by mammography.
    Asaro JR
    W V Med J; 1977 Feb; 73(2):25-8. PubMed ID: 264712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Computer-aided detection schemes: the effect of limiting the number of cued regions in each case.
    Zheng B; Leader JK; Abrams G; Shindel B; Catullo V; Good WF; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Mar; 182(3):579-83. PubMed ID: 14975949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography: the importance of the question and the critical numbers game.
    Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17954652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Bening and precancerous pathology of the breast, senography].
    Usandizaga Soraluce M; Salvador Monte R
    Acta Obstet Ginecol Hisp Lusit; 1976 Apr; 24(4):189-231. PubMed ID: 1026014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. 3-D reconstruction of microcalcification clusters using stereo imaging: algorithm and mammographic unit calibration.
    Daul C; Graebling P; Tiedeu A; Wolf D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2058-73. PubMed ID: 16366229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Be careful to not willingly suspend disbelief.
    Kopans DB
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):645-7. PubMed ID: 15564403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment.
    Gur D; Stalder JS; Hardesty LA; Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Chough DM; Shindel BE; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 15358846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mammographers' ranks shrink as demand for breast images grows.
    Washam C
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Jun; 97(11):792-3. PubMed ID: 15928296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why CAD Failed in Mammography.
    Kohli A; Jha S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Mar; 15(3 Pt B):535-537. PubMed ID: 29398499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Current possibilities of x-ray diagnosis in breast cancer].
    Arablinskiĭ VM; Ostrovskaia IM; Demidov VP; Lipkovich VS
    Sov Med; 1989; (8):74-7. PubMed ID: 2814671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammographic parenchymal pattern and breast cancer risk: a critical appraisal of the evidence.
    Goodwin PJ; Boyd NF
    Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Jun; 127(6):1097-108. PubMed ID: 3285665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program.
    te Brake GM; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH
    Radiology; 1998 May; 207(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 9577496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.