These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14752354)

  • 1. Comparison of SRS questionnaire results submitted by both parents and patients in the operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis.
    Rinella A; Lenke L; Peelle M; Edwards C; Bridwell KH; Sides B
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 14752354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Video-assisted anterior thoracoscopic spinal fusion versus posterior spinal fusion: a comparative study utilizing the SRS-22 outcome instrument.
    Lonner BS; Auerbach JD; Estreicher M; Milby AH; Kean KE; Panagopoulos G; Chang D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 19139671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient-Reported SRS-24 Outcomes Scores After Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Have Improved Since the New Millennium.
    Bastrom TP; Bartley CE; Newton PO;
    Spine Deform; 2019 Nov; 7(6):917-922. PubMed ID: 31732002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discriminative and predictive validity of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire in management and curve-severity subgroups of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
    Parent EC; Hill D; Mahood J; Moreau M; Raso J; Lou E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2450-7. PubMed ID: 19829260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients report increased pain at five years compared with two years after surgical treatment.
    Upasani VV; Caltoum C; Petcharaporn M; Bastrom TP; Pawelek JB; Betz RR; Clements DH; Lenke LG; Lowe TG; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(10):1107-12. PubMed ID: 18449045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome instrument.
    Merola AA; Haher TR; Brkaric M; Panagopoulos G; Mathur S; Kohani O; Lowe TG; Lenke LG; Wenger DR; Newton PO; Clements DH; Betz RR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Sep; 27(18):2046-51. PubMed ID: 12634567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of postoperative residual spinal deformity and patient outcome in idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan using the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument.
    Watanabe K; Hasegawa K; Hirano T; Uchiyama S; Endo N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):550-4. PubMed ID: 17334289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire.
    Schlösser TP; Stadhouder A; Schimmel JJ; Lehr AM; van der Heijden GJ; Castelein RM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1663-72. PubMed ID: 24360746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissecting the effects of spinal fusion and deformity magnitude on quality of life in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Tsutsui S; Pawelek J; Bastrom T; Lenke L; Lowe T; Betz R; Clements D; Newton PO
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Aug; 34(18):E653-8. PubMed ID: 19680091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A multicenter study analyzing the relationship of a standardized radiographic scoring system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument.
    Wilson PL; Newton PO; Wenger DR; Haher T; Merola A; Lenke L; Lowe T; Clements D; Betz R
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Sep; 27(18):2036-40. PubMed ID: 12634565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body Image Disturbance Improvement After Operative Correction of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
    Lonner BS; Brochin R; Lewis R; Vig KS; Kassin G; Castillo A; Ren Y
    Spine Deform; 2019 Sep; 7(5):741-745. PubMed ID: 31495474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Major Complications at Two Years After Surgery Impact SRS Scores for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients.
    Bastrom TP; Yaszay B; Shah SA; Miyanji F; Lonner BS; Kelly MP; Samdani A; Asghar J; Newton PO
    Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):93-99. PubMed ID: 30587327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective evaluation of quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery.
    Pellegrino LN; Avanzi O
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Dec; 27(8):409-14. PubMed ID: 23096129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative bracing affects postoperative outcome of posterior spine fusion with instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Diab M; Sharkey M; Emans J; Lenke L; Oswald T; Sucato D;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(20):1876-9. PubMed ID: 20844423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part I: comparison with nonscoliosis group: preliminary/limited review in a Japanese population.
    Watanabe K; Hasegawa K; Hirano T; Uchiyama S; Endo N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):1197-201. PubMed ID: 15897835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality of life in children and adolescents undergoing spinal deformity surgery.
    McKean GM; Tsirikos AI
    J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2017; 30(2):339-346. PubMed ID: 27858696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cross-cultural comparison of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument between American and Japanese idiopathic scoliosis patients: are there differences?
    Watanabe K; Lenke LG; Bridwell KH; Hasegawa K; Hirano T; Endo N; Cheh G; Kim YJ; Hensley M; Stobbs G; Koester L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(24):2711-4. PubMed ID: 18007249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do postoperative radiographically verified technical success, improved cosmesis, and trunk shift corroborate with patient-reported outcomes in Lenke 1C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?
    Sharma S; Bünger CE; Andersen T; Sun H; Wu C; Hansen ES
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Jul; 24(7):1462-72. PubMed ID: 25563196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimum 20 Years Long-term Clinical Outcome After Spinal Fusion and Instrumentation for Scoliosis: Comparison of the SRS-22 Patient Questionnaire With That in Nonscoliosis Group.
    Iida T; Suzuki N; Kono K; Ohyama Y; Imura J; Ato A; Ozeki S; Nohara Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Aug; 40(16):E922-8. PubMed ID: 25996533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of the scoliosis research society outcomes instrument to evaluate patient outcome in untreated idiopathic scoliosis patients in Japan: part II: relation between spinal deformity and patient outcomes.
    Watanabe K; Hasegawa K; Hirano T; Uchiyama S; Endo N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 May; 30(10):1202-5. PubMed ID: 15897836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.