189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14752634)
1. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system.
Hernandez JD; Bann SD; Munz Y; Moorthy K; Datta V; Martin S; Dosis A; Bello F; Darzi A; Rockall T
Surg Endosc; 2004 Mar; 18(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 14752634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Learning curve of robotic-assisted microvascular anastomosis in the rat.
Lee JY; Mattar T; Parisi TJ; Carlsen BT; Bishop AT; Shin AY
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2012 Sep; 28(7):451-6. PubMed ID: 21959547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does robotic assistance improve efficiency in performing complex minimally invasive surgical procedures?
Jayaraman S; Quan D; Al-Ghamdi I; El-Deen F; Schlachta CM
Surg Endosc; 2010 Mar; 24(3):584-8. PubMed ID: 19633893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The benefits of stereoscopic vision in robotic-assisted performance on bench models.
Munz Y; Moorthy K; Dosis A; Hernandez JD; Bann S; Bello F; Martin S; Darzi A; Rockall T
Surg Endosc; 2004 Apr; 18(4):611-6. PubMed ID: 14752629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of haptic learning in telemanipulator-assisted surgery.
Jacobs S; Holzhey D; Strauss G; Burgert O; Falk V
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Oct; 17(5):402-6. PubMed ID: 18049401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skills acquisition and assessment after a microsurgical skills course for ophthalmology residents.
Ezra DG; Aggarwal R; Michaelides M; Okhravi N; Verma S; Benjamin L; Bloom P; Darzi A; Sullivan P
Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 19091411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of IQ, computer-gaming skills, general dexterity, and laparoscopic experience on performance with the da Vinci surgical system.
Hagen ME; Wagner OJ; Inan I; Morel P
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Sep; 5(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 19455549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The surgical efficiency score: a feasible, reliable, and valid method of skills assessment.
Datta V; Bann S; Mandalia M; Darzi A
Am J Surg; 2006 Sep; 192(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 16920433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery.
Moorthy K; Munz Y; Dosis A; Hernandez J; Martin S; Bello F; Rockall T; Darzi A
Surg Endosc; 2004 May; 18(5):790-5. PubMed ID: 15216862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Towards automatic skill evaluation: detection and segmentation of robot-assisted surgical motions.
Lin HC; Shafran I; Yuh D; Hager GD
Comput Aided Surg; 2006 Sep; 11(5):220-30. PubMed ID: 17127647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery systems in a suturing and knot tying task.
Eisenberg D; Vidovszky TJ; Lau J; Guiroy B; Rivas H
Surg Endosc; 2013 Sep; 27(9):3182-6. PubMed ID: 23443484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model.
Ruurda JP; Broeders IA; Pulles B; Kappelhof FM; van der Werken C
Surg Endosc; 2004 Aug; 18(8):1249-52. PubMed ID: 15164281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurements of the level of surgical expertise using flight path analysis from da Vinci robotic surgical system.
Verner L; Oleynikov D; Holtmann S; Haider H; Zhukov L
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():373-8. PubMed ID: 15455928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system.
Hubens G; Coveliers H; Balliu L; Ruppert M; Vaneerdeweg W
Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1595-9. PubMed ID: 12874678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Face, content and concurrent validity of the Mimic® dV-Trainer for robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a prospective study.
Egi H; Hattori M; Tokunaga M; Suzuki T; Kawaguchi K; Sawada H; Ohdan H
Eur Surg Res; 2013; 50(3-4):292-300. PubMed ID: 23859887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Basic Surgical Skill Retention: Can Patriot Motion Tracking System Provide an Objective Measurement for it?
Shaharan S; Nugent E; Ryan DM; Traynor O; Neary P; Buckley D
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 26572096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Objective surgery -- advanced robotic devices and simulators used for surgical skill assessment].
Suhánszki N; Haidegger T
Magy Seb; 2014 Dec; 67(6):340-52. PubMed ID: 25500641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: cost and training.
Amodeo A; Linares Quevedo A; Joseph JV; Belgrano E; Patel HR
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2009 Jun; 61(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 19451894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Objective assessment of robotic surgical skill using instrument contact vibrations.
Gomez ED; Aggarwal R; McMahan W; Bark K; Kuchenbecker KJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Apr; 30(4):1419-31. PubMed ID: 26201410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients.
Mohr FW; Falk V; Diegeler A; Walther T; Gummert JF; Bucerius J; Jacobs S; Autschbach R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 May; 121(5):842-53. PubMed ID: 11326227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
