These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14753331)

  • 1. Thermal and mechanical load cycling on microleakage and shear bond strength to dentin.
    Bedran-de-Castro AK; Cardoso PE; Ambrosano GM; Pimenta LA
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14753331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bonded amalgam restorations: microleakage and tensile bond strength evaluation.
    Muniz M; Quioca J; Dolci GS; Reis A; Loguercio AD
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 15853109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives.
    Duarte S; de Freitas CR; Saad JR; Sadan A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jul; 102(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 19573687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on microtensile bond strength of a total-etch adhesive system.
    Bedran-de-Castro AK; Pereira PN; Pimenta LA; Thompson JY
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 15088725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of elastic cavity wall and occlusal loading on microleakage and dentin bond strength.
    Pongprueksa P; Kuphasuk W; Senawongse P
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):466-75. PubMed ID: 17910223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M; Theodoridou-Pahini S; Papadogiannis Y; Karezis A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
    Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear bond strengths and microleakage of four types of dentin adhesive materials.
    Ateyah NZ; Elhejazi AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Feb; 5(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 14973561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations.
    Erhardt MC; Magalhães CS; Serra MC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 12120778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage.
    Cenci M; Demarco F; de Carvalho R
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):603-10. PubMed ID: 16005800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems.
    Bedran de Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Amaral CM; Ambrosano GM
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of water flow rate on shear bond strength of resin composite to Er:YAG cavity preparation.
    Colucci V; Lucisano MP; do Amaral FL; Pécora JD; Palma-Dibb RG; Corona SA
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 18578182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of different tests used to measure the bond strength to dentin of two adhesive systems.
    Cavalcante LM; Erhardt MC; Bedran-de-Castro AK; Pimenta LA; Ambrosano GM
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 16555656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the substrate and load application method on the shear bond strength of two adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE; Meloncini MA; Placido E; Lima Jde O; Tavares AU
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):388-94. PubMed ID: 12877424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of four simplified adhesive systems under thermal and mechanical stresses.
    Cardoso PE; Placido E; Moura SK
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):164-8. PubMed ID: 12469753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.