164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14753332)
1. Support of occlusal enamel provided by bonded restorations.
Grisanti LP; Troendle KB; Summitt JB
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 14753332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials.
Latino C; Troendle K; Summitt JB
Quintessence Int; 2001 Apr; 32(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 12066648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Demineralization inhibition of direct tooth-colored restorative materials.
Gonzalez Ede H; Yap AU; Hsu SC
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 15470881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of four restorative materials to support undermined occlusal enamel of permanent teeth.
Prabhakar AR; Thejokrishna P; Kurthukoti AJ
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Sep; 24(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 17065778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage.
Xie KX; Wang XY; Gao XJ; Yuan CY; Li JX; Chu CH
Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 22242600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Compressive fracture resistance of porcelain laminates bonded to enamel or dentin with four adhesive systems.
Piemjai M; Arksornnukit M
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 17672830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Simulated oral environment and microleakage of Class II resin-based composite and sandwich restorations.
Besnault C; Attal JP
Am J Dent; 2003 Jun; 16(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 12967073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of layering techniques on the micro-tensile bond strength to dentin in resin composite restorations.
Niu Y; Ma X; Fan M; Zhu S
Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):129-34. PubMed ID: 18614225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determination of mode of fracture of adhesive restorative materials. An invitro study.
Nayak UA; Suasha P
Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(2):112-4. PubMed ID: 12420578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Wang L; Sakai VT; Kawai ES; Buzalaf MA; Atta MT
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16457670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparative evaluation of four adhesive tooth coloured restorative materials. An invitro study.
Nayak UA; Sudha P; Vidya M
Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 12420568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro evaluation of the marginal seal of four restoration materials on deciduous molars.
Atash R; Bottenberg P; Petein M; Vanden Abbeele A
Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2003; 45(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 14535057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
Sengun A; Cobankara FK; Orucoglu H
Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin.
Hikita K; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J; Ikeda T; Van Landuyt K; Maida T; Lambrechts P; Peumans M
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16426673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
Yap AU; Yap SH; Teo CK; Ng JJ
Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
