BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14753616)

  • 1. A VSA-based strategy for placing conservation buffers in agricultural watersheds.
    Qiu Z
    Environ Manage; 2003 Sep; 32(3):299-311. PubMed ID: 14753616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land.
    Dosskey MG
    Environ Manage; 2001 Nov; 28(5):577-98. PubMed ID: 11568840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing critical source areas in watersheds for conservation buffer planning and riparian restoration.
    Qiu Z
    Environ Manage; 2009 Nov; 44(5):968-80. PubMed ID: 19777291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Landscape planning for agricultural nonpoint source pollution reduction I: a geographical allocation framework.
    Diebel MW; Maxted JT; Nowak PJ; Vander Zanden MJ
    Environ Manage; 2008 Nov; 42(5):789-802. PubMed ID: 18704561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Agroforestry buffers for nonpoint source pollution reductions from agricultural watersheds.
    Udawatta RP; Garrett HE; Kallenbach R
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(3):800-6. PubMed ID: 21546665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using Spatially Targeted Conservation to Evaluate Nitrogen Reduction and Economic Opportunities for Best Management Practice Placement in Agricultural Landscapes.
    Zimmerman EK; Tyndall JC; Schulte LA
    Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 64(3):313-328. PubMed ID: 31367774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving risk estimates of runoff producing areas: formulating variable source areas as a bivariate process.
    Cheng X; Shaw SB; Marjerison RD; Yearick CD; DeGloria SD; Walter MT
    J Environ Manage; 2014 May; 137():146-56. PubMed ID: 24632403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Setting priorities for research on pollution reduction functions of agricultural buffers.
    Dosskey MG
    Environ Manage; 2002 Nov; 30(5):641-50. PubMed ID: 12375085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Riparian buffer strips as a multifunctional management tool in agricultural landscapes: introduction.
    Stutter MI; Chardon WJ; Kronvang B
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(2):297-303. PubMed ID: 22370391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic assessment of watershed-scale nonpoint source pollution during rainfall-runoff events in the Miyun Reservoir watershed.
    Qiu J; Shen Z; Wei G; Wang G; Xie H; Lv G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Mar; 25(7):6514-6531. PubMed ID: 29255977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hydrochemical buffer assessment in agricultural landscapes: from local to catchment scale.
    Viaud V; Merot P; Baudry J
    Environ Manage; 2004 Oct; 34(4):559-73. PubMed ID: 15747410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationships Between Landscape Characteristics and Nonpoint Source Pollution Inputs to Coastal Estuaries.
    BASNYAT P; TEETER LD; FLYNN KM; LOCKABY BG
    Environ Manage; 1999 May; 23(4):539-549. PubMed ID: 10085386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phosphorus reductions following riparian restoration in two agricultural watersheds in Vermont, USA.
    Meals DW; Hopkins RB
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 12079124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reduction effects of riparian reforestation on runoff and nutrient export based on AnnAGNPS model in a small typical watershed, China.
    Jiang K; Li Z; Luo C; Wu M; Chao L; Zhou Q; Zhao H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Feb; 26(6):5934-5943. PubMed ID: 30613883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The challenge of documenting water quality benefits of conservation practices: a review of USDA-ARS's conservation effects assessment project watershed studies.
    Tomer MD; Locke MA
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):300-10. PubMed ID: 22053489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating agricultural best management practices in tile-drained subwatersheds of the Mackinaw River, Illinois.
    Lemke AM; Kirkham KG; Lindenbaum TT; Herbert ME; Tear TH; Perry WL; Herkert JR
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(4):1215-28. PubMed ID: 21712591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying riparian buffer effects on stream nitrogen in southeastern coastal plain watersheds.
    Christensen JR; Nash MS; Neale A
    Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 52(5):1161-76. PubMed ID: 23989318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A novel index for assessment of riparian strip efficiency in agricultural landscapes using high spatial resolution satellite imagery.
    Novoa J; Chokmani K; Lhissou R
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():1439-1451. PubMed ID: 30743856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatially-Distributed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Framework to Control Phosphorus from Agricultural Diffuse Pollution.
    Geng R; Wang X; Sharpley AN; Meng F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0130607. PubMed ID: 26313561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Agricultural Conservation Planning Framework: 3. Land Use and Field Boundary Database Development and Structure.
    Tomer MD; James DE; Sandoval-Green CMJ
    J Environ Qual; 2017 May; 46(3):676-686. PubMed ID: 28724111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.