These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1475429)

  • 1. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
    Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
    Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The choice of radiographic film-screen systems: quality evaluation and purchasing specifications drafting. Report on A.I.F.B. Working Group activity.
    Borasi G; Bregant P; Crespi A; De Denaro M; Ferretti PP; De Guarrini F; Levrero F; Mozzo P; Novario R; Pedroli G
    Radiol Med; 1993 May; 85(5):662-7. PubMed ID: 8327771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
    Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Focal-spot measurement: comparison of slit, pinhole, and star resolution pattern techniques.
    Everson JD; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):261-4. PubMed ID: 3628780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of the quality of screen-film radiographic systems: physical principles and methods of measurement].
    Borasi G; Berardi P; Ferretti PP; Piccagli V
    Radiol Med; 1990 Sep; 80(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 2236696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
    Friedrich M; Weskamp P
    Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
    Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The parameters of image quality of a novel ultra high resolution film-screen system].
    Beutel J; Mickewich DJ; Issler SL; Shaw R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8136386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Experiences with a new film-screen system in pediatric thoracic radiography].
    Leenen A; Brandt GA; Riebel T; Marciniak H
    Rofo; 1996 Oct; 165(4):349-52. PubMed ID: 8963046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Comparison of film-screen combinations with contrast detail diagram and interactive image analysis. 2: Linear assessment of grey scale ranges with interactive image analysis].
    Stamm G; Eichbaum G; Hagemann G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 9410005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets].
    Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparison of film-screen combinations in contrast-detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 3: Trimodal histograms of gray scale distribution in bar groups of lead pattern images].
    Hagemann G; Eichbaum G; Stamm G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 May; 8(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9645256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A protocol for evaluating screen-film systems].
    Benini L; Gozzi G; Bellis G; De Guarrini F; Dalla Palma L
    Radiol Med; 1992; 84(1-2):92-7. PubMed ID: 1509153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A new rare earth intensifying screen: lanthanum oxybromide (Quanta III - Dupont): relative speed, resolution and image quality (author's transl)].
    Bergamini C; Laudicina L; Marengo M; Pavlica P; Viglietta G; Zanini M
    Radiol Med; 1980 Oct; 66(10):699-704. PubMed ID: 7221029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.