These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14754712)

  • 1. Ethical dimensions of elective primary cesarean delivery.
    Minkoff H; Powderly KR; Chervenak F; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 103(2):387-92. PubMed ID: 14754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient choice cesarean delivery: ethical issues.
    Kalish RB; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Apr; 20(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 18388809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cesarean section without clinical indication versus vaginal delivery as a paradigmatic model in the discourse of medical setting decisions.
    Demontis R; Pisu S; Pintor M; D'aloja E
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1470-5. PubMed ID: 21158491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. C-section for organ donation.
    Berkowitz ST; Newman LE; Mathieu DR
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(2):22; discussion 22-4. PubMed ID: 2318622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient choice cesarean--the Maine experience.
    Wax JR; Cartin A; Pinette MG; Blackstone J
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):203-6. PubMed ID: 16128974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent.
    Lescale KB; Inglis SR; Eddleman KA; Peeper EQ; Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Am J Perinatol; 1996 Apr; 13(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 8688110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intrapartum elective cesarean delivery: a previously unrecognized clinical entity.
    Kalish RB; McCullough L; Gupta M; Thaler HT; Chervenak FA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jun; 103(6):1137-41. PubMed ID: 15172844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ethics of cesarean section by choice.
    Minkoff H
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):309-12. PubMed ID: 17011404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):302-5. PubMed ID: 8559543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethics and "cesarean delivery on maternal demand".
    Latham SR; Norwitz ER
    Semin Perinatol; 2009 Dec; 33(6):405-9. PubMed ID: 19914526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating the rate of cesarean section by maternal request: anonymous survey of obstetricians in Australia.
    Robson SJ; Tan WS; Adeyemi A; Dear KB
    Birth; 2009 Sep; 36(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 19747267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Elective primary cesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists.
    Wu JM; Hundley AF; Visco AG
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Feb; 105(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 15684156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Turkish obstetricians' personal preference for mode of delivery and attitude toward cesarean delivery on maternal request.
    Arikan DC; Ozer A; Arikan I; Coskun A; Kiran H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 20872227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cesarean delivery on maternal request: wise use of finite resources? A view from the trenches.
    Druzin ML; El-Sayed YY
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):305-8. PubMed ID: 17011403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ethical justification for emergency, coerced cesarean delivery.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Skupski DW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):1029-35. PubMed ID: 8233254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The ethics of cesarean section on maternal request: a feminist critique of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' position on patient-choice surgery.
    Bergeron V
    Bioethics; 2007 Nov; 21(9):478-87. PubMed ID: 17927624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology.
    Menacker F; Declercq E; Macdorman MF
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):235-41. PubMed ID: 17011392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compelled cesarean section. An ethical perspective.
    Doukas DJ; Elkins TE
    Prim Care; 1993 Sep; 20(3):721-8. PubMed ID: 8378462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.