126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14757955)
1. A comparison of stainless steel and CP titanium rods for the anterior instrumentation of scoliosis.
Haher T; Ottaviano D; Lapman P; Goldfarb B; Merola A; Valdevit A
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 14757955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Titanium versus stainless steel for anterior spinal fusions: an analysis of rod stress as a predictor of rod breakage during physiologic loading in a bovine model.
Wedemeyer M; Parent S; Mahar A; Odell T; Swimmer T; Newton P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17202891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. New rod-plate anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: biomechanical evaluation compared with dual-rod and single-rod with structural interbody support.
Zhang H; Johnston CE; Pierce WA; Ashman RB; Bronson DG; Haideri NF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):E934-40. PubMed ID: 17139209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between 4.0-mm stainless steel and 4.75-mm titanium alloy single-rod spinal instrumentation for anterior thoracoscopic scoliosis surgery.
Yoon SH; Ugrinow VL; Upasani VV; Pawelek JB; Newton PO
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2173-8. PubMed ID: 18794758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro comparison of bioresorbable and titanium anterior cervical plates in the immediate postoperative condition.
Freeman AL; Derincek A; Beaubien BP; Buttermann GR; Lew WD; Wood KB
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Dec; 19(8):577-83. PubMed ID: 17146301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength.
Lindsey C; Deviren V; Xu Z; Yeh RF; Puttlitz CM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Jul; 31(15):1680-7. PubMed ID: 16816763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel dual-rod screw for thoracoscopic anterior instrumentation: biomechanical evaluation compared with single-rod and double-screw/double-rod anterior constructs.
Zhang H; Sucato DJ; Pierce WA; Ross D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(5):E183-8. PubMed ID: 19247158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) model can provide results comparable to cadaveric models.
Haher TR; Ottaviano D; DeFrancis JG; Merola A; Valdevit A
Biomed Mater Eng; 2004; 14(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 14757956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of different anchors (foundations) for the pediatric dual growing rod technique.
Mahar AT; Bagheri R; Oka R; Kostial P; Akbarnia BA
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 18082463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is galvanic corrosion between titanium alloy and stainless steel spinal implants a clinical concern?
Serhan H; Slivka M; Albert T; Kwak SD
Spine J; 2004; 4(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 15246296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro fixator rod loading after transforaminal compared to anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Kettler A; Niemeyer T; Issler L; Merk U; Mahalingam M; Werner K; Claes L; Wilke HJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):435-42. PubMed ID: 16442678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Biomechanical study on lumbar spondylodeses using an internal fixateur consisting of a titanium alloy].
Steffen R; Wittenberg R; Plafki C
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12605334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis.
Cahill PJ; Wang W; Asghar J; Booker R; Betz RR; Ramsey C; Baran G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(12):E687-95. PubMed ID: 22210013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unilateral and bilateral sacropelvic fixation result in similar construct biomechanics.
Tomlinson T; Chen J; Upasani V; Mahar A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Sep; 33(20):2127-33. PubMed ID: 18794753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanics of cantilever "plow" during anterior thoracic scoliosis correction.
Mahar AT; Brown DS; Oka RS; Newton PO
Spine J; 2006; 6(5):572-6. PubMed ID: 16934730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
Niemeyer TK; Koriller M; Claes L; Kettler A; Werner K; Wilke HJ
Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
