BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14758239)

  • 1. Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral breast augmentation: sensory changes, muscle function, and body image.
    Banbury J; Yetman R; Lucas A; Papay F; Graves K; Zins JE
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Feb; 113(2):701-7; discussion 708-11. PubMed ID: 14758239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Increased self-confidence and decreased sexual discomfort after subpectoral mammaplasty].
    Bruck JC; Kleinschmidt A; Ottomann C
    Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 2011 Apr; 43(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 21132627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective analysis of the outcome of subpectoral augmentation.
    Chester DL; Hodgson E; Khanna A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 May; 115(6):1781; author reply 1781. PubMed ID: 15861098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation.
    Spear SL; Schwartz J; Dayan JH; Clemens MW
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jan; 33(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 19052809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of the psychological benefits of breast augmentation for aesthetic purposes. Results of a multicenter prospective study of a series of 181 patients].
    Penaud A; De Mortillet S
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2013 Feb; 58(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 23122532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Muscular Etiology for Medial Implant Malposition Following Subpectoral Augmentation.
    Moliver CL; Sanchez ER; Kaltwasser K; Sanchez RJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2015 Sep; 35(7):NP203-10. PubMed ID: 26104475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subpectoral breast augmentation through the abdominoplasty incision.
    Rinker B; Jack JM
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Mar; 58(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 17471125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of botulinum toxin type A on the capsule around a subpectoral implant for breast augmentation.
    Xiao Z
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):782-3. PubMed ID: 19242747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of combined skin sparing mastectomy and immediate subpectoral prosthetic reconstruction on the pectoralis major muscle function: a preoperative and postoperative comparative study.
    Hage JJ; van der Heeden JF; Lankhorst KM; Romviel SM; Vluttters ME; Woerdeman LA; Visser B; Veeger HE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014; 72(6):631-7. PubMed ID: 23486118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nipple-areola complex sensitivity after primary breast augmentation: a comparison of periareolar and inframammary incision approaches.
    Mofid MM; Klatsky SA; Singh NK; Nahabedian MY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1694-8. PubMed ID: 16651938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
    Góes JC; Landecker A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The adjustable saline augmentation mammaplasty.
    Springer R
    Plast Surg Nurs; 1999; 19(1):19-21. PubMed ID: 10478126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anatomy of the sternal origin of the pectoralis major: implications for subpectoral augmentation.
    Sanchez ER; Howland N; Kaltwasser K; Moliver CL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Nov; 34(8):1179-84. PubMed ID: 25121786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional evaluation of breast augmentation and the influence of anatomic and round implants on operative breast shape changes.
    Kovacs L; Eder M; Zimmermann A; Müller D; Schuster T; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E; Klöppel M; Machens HG
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):879-87. PubMed ID: 22535137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Augmentation mammaplasty: retrospective analysis of 210 cases.
    Sevin A; Sevin K; Senen D; Deren O; Adanali G; Erdogan B
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(6):651-4. PubMed ID: 17093874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation.
    Pitanguy I; Vaena M; Radwanski HN; Nunes D; Vargas AF
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(3):238-43. PubMed ID: 17484059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Functional and Volumetric Analysis of the Pectoralis Major Muscle After Submuscular Breast Augmentation.
    Roxo AC; Nahas FX; Pinheiro Rodrigues NC; Salles JI; Amaral Cossich VR; de Castro CC; Aboudib JH; Marques RG
    Aesthet Surg J; 2017 Jun; 37(6):654-661. PubMed ID: 28333173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iatrogenic Symmastia: Causes and Suggested Repair Technique.
    Kalaria SS; Henderson J; Moliver CL
    Aesthet Surg J; 2019 Jul; 39(8):863-872. PubMed ID: 30137185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Augmentation mammaplasty: where should the implant be placed?
    Takayanagi S; Nakagawa C; Sugimoto Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 15170249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.