BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14759032)

  • 21. Perceptual and motor effects of morphine and buprenorphine in baboons.
    Hienz RD; Zarcone TJ; Brady JV
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2001; 69(1-2):305-13. PubMed ID: 11420099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2141-55. PubMed ID: 11681391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speaking fundamental frequency and vowel formant frequencies: effects on perception of gender.
    Gelfer MP; Bennett QE
    J Voice; 2013 Sep; 27(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 23415148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The responses of female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) to anomalous social interactions: evidence for causal reasoning?
    Cheney DL; Seyfarth RM; Silk JB
    J Comp Psychol; 1995 Jun; 109(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 7758289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0.
    Culling JF; Darwin CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jun; 93(6):3454-67. PubMed ID: 8326071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Informational masking and the effects of differences in fundamental frequency and fundamental-frequency contour on phonetic integration in a formant ensemble.
    Summers RJ; Bailey PJ; Roberts B
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():295-303. PubMed ID: 27815130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception.
    Nearey TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2088-113. PubMed ID: 2659638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Mice and humans perceive multiharmonic communication sounds in the same way.
    Ehret G; Riecke S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Jan; 99(1):479-82. PubMed ID: 11756654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Formant discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds for English and Chinese listeners.
    Liu C; Tao S; Wang W; Dong Q
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL189-95. PubMed ID: 22979831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fundamental frequency as a perceptual cue for vowel identification in speakers with Parkinson's disease.
    Bunton K
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2006; 58(5):323-39. PubMed ID: 16966834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vocalizations of adult gelada baboons (Theropithecus gelada): acoustic structure and behavioural context.
    Aich H; Moos-Heilen R; Zimmermann E
    Folia Primatol (Basel); 1990; 55(3-4):109-32. PubMed ID: 2262173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Thresholds for second formant transitions in front vowels.
    Kewley-Port D; Goodman SS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3252-60. PubMed ID: 16334904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sex-specific fundamental and formant frequency patterns in a cross-sectional study.
    Whiteside SP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jul; 110(1):464-78. PubMed ID: 11508971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Queen's English: an alternative, biosocial hypothesis for the distinctive features of "gay speech".
    Rendall D; Vasey PL; McKenzie J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2008 Feb; 37(1):188-204. PubMed ID: 18085431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual and acoustic evidence for species-level differences in meow vocalizations by domestic cats (Felis catus) and African wild cats (Felis silvestris lybica).
    Nicastro N
    J Comp Psychol; 2004 Sep; 118(3):287-96. PubMed ID: 15482056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency measurement of vowel formants produced by Brazilian children aged between 4 and 8 years.
    Viegas F; Viegas D; Baeck HE
    J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 25510161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stimulus presentation order and the perception of lexical tones in Cantonese.
    Francis AL; Ciocca V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1611-21. PubMed ID: 14514214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fundamental frequency effects on thresholds for vowel formant discrimination.
    Kewley-Port D; Li X; Zheng Y; Neel AT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Oct; 100(4 Pt 1):2462-70. PubMed ID: 8865651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of roving level and spectral range on vowel formant discrimination.
    Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL264-70. PubMed ID: 21974502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The relative importance of spectral tilt in monophthongs and diphthongs.
    Kiefte M; Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Mar; 117(3 Pt 1):1395-404. PubMed ID: 15807027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.