438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14759108)
1. A randomized prospective clinical trial on the effectiveness of three treatment modalities for patients with lower denture problems. A 10 year follow-up study on patient satisfaction.
Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; van 't Hof M; Stegenga B; Vissink A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):498-503. PubMed ID: 14759108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of three treatment modalities for the edentulous mandible. A five-year randomized clinical trial.
Raghoebar GM; Meijer HJ; Stegenga B; van't Hof MA; van Oort RP; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Jun; 11(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 11168210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Implant-retained overdentures compared with complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. Satisfaction and subjective chewing capabilities].
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; van 't Hof MA; Geertman ME
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2002 Dec; 109(12):475-80. PubMed ID: 12572098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional complete dentures: a 10-year prospective study of clinical aspects and patient satisfaction.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Van 't Hof MA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):879-85. PubMed ID: 14696664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Overdenture prostheses on implants versus complete dentures].
Geertman ME; Boerrigter EM; van 't Hof MA; van Waas MA; van Oort RP; Kwakman JM; Boering G; Kalk W
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1998 May; 105(5):174-7. PubMed ID: 11928421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of mandibular ridge height on patients' perceptions with mandibular conventional and implant-assisted overdentures.
Kimoto K; Garrett NR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 16274151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Implant-retained overdentures compared with complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. A prospective study followed over 10 years].
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; van 't Hof MA
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Jan; 112(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 15693603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-supported complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 1).
Hobkirk JA; Abdel-Latif HH; Howlett J; Welfare R; Moles DR
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 19149063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a cross-over clinical trial.
Cune M; van Kampen F; van der Bilt A; Bosman F
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 15889656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized, prospective, clinical evaluation of prosthodontic modalities for mandibular implant overdenture treatment.
Burns DR; Unger JW; Coffey JP; Waldrop TC; Elswick RK
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jul; 106(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 21723989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prosthetic treatment time and satisfaction of edentulous patients treated with conventional or implant-stabilized complete mandibular dentures: a case-control study (part 2).
Hobkirk JA; Abdel-Latif HH; Howlett J; Welfare R; Moles DR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 19260422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An economic evaluation of implant treatment in edentulous patients-preliminary results.
Zitzmann NU; Sendi P; Marinello CP
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 15754888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
