These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 14759574)

  • 1. Further prospective findings with compound action potentials from Nucleus 24 cochlear implants.
    Polak M; Hodges AV; King JE; Balkany TJ
    Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 188(1-2):104-16. PubMed ID: 14759574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant.
    Busby PA; Battmer RD; Pesch J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differences between electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and behavioral measures in children with cochlear implants operated in the school age vs. operated in the first years of life.
    Vlahović S; Šindija B; Aras I; Glunčić M; Trotić R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 76(5):731-9. PubMed ID: 22398117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing fitting in children using objective measures such as neural response imaging and electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold.
    Caner G; Olgun L; Gültekin G; Balaban M
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):637-40. PubMed ID: 17667772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
    Jolly CN; Clopton BM; Spelman FA; Lineaweaver SK
    Med Prog Technol; 1997; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Electrically evoked auditory nerve compound action potentials in Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant users].
    Zhu X; Cao K; Pan T; Yang H; Wang Y
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 16(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11944479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intracochlear and extracochlear ECAPs suggest antidromic action potentials.
    Miller CA; Abbas PJ; Hay-McCutcheon MJ; Robinson BK; Nourski KV; Jeng FC
    Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 198(1-2):75-86. PubMed ID: 15567605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system.
    Cafarelli Dees D; Dillier N; Lai WK; von Wallenberg E; van Dijk B; Akdas F; Aksit M; Batman C; Beynon A; Burdo S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Conway M; Coudert C; Craddock L; Cullington H; Deggouj N; Fraysse B; Grabel S; Kiefer J; Kiss JG; Lenarz T; Mair A; Maune S; Müller-Deile J; Piron JP; Razza S; Tasche C; Thai-Van H; Toth F; Truy E; Uziel A; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 15650302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
    Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of objective test techniques in cochlear implant users with inner ear malformations.
    Cinar BC; Atas A; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1065-74. PubMed ID: 21817941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of stylet removal on neural response telemetry and stapedial reflex thresholds during cochlear implantation.
    Rajati M; Ghassemi MM; Bakhshaee M; Tale MR; Tayarani H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Jun; 41(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 24359704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AutoNR: an automated system that measures ECAP thresholds with the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant via machine intelligence.
    Botros A; van Dijk B; Killian M
    Artif Intell Med; 2007 May; 40(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 16920343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM; Chen XQ; Zhao XT; Kong Y; Li YX; Liu S; Liu B; Mo LY
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users.
    Kosaner J; Spitzer P; Bayguzina S; Gultekin M; Behar LA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29291688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem responses for lateral and medial placement of the Clarion HiFocus electrode.
    Firszt JB; Wackym PA; Gaggl W; Burg LS; Reeder RM
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 12677114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.